> I don't want to repeat myself, my reply is in the original thread, however,
> in addition, you will note that some tasks take a lot of flags, documenting
> all flags for each task would make the output of ./gradlew tasks unreadable.
>
> So I recommend not doing that.
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Because I'm not satisfied with (eg)
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> "gradlew help --task pullPluginSource"
>>
>> :help
>> Detailed task information for pullPluginSource
>> Path
>> :pullPluginSource
>> Type
>> Task (org.gradle.api.Task)
>> Description
>> Download and install a plugin from source control
>> Group
>> OFBiz Plugin
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> In other words, I have to look into the README file each time I don't
>> remember the string to pass behind -P , here pluginId
>>
>> So I'd like to change the description
>> -task pullPluginSource(group: ofbizPlugin, description: 'Download
>> and install a plugin from source control') {
>> +task pullPluginSource(group: ofbizPlugin, description: 'Download
>> and install a plugin from source control, parameter: pluginId') {
>>
>> same for all tasks with parameters.
>>
>> Agreed?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 17/03/2017 à 10:43, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>>
>>> Why are you repeating conversations we already had?
>>>
>>>
https://s.apache.org/E1dE>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>> There was something very convenient with "Ant -p" "documentation": syntax
>>>> examples.
>>>>
>>>> I believe we miss that, at least found it when using "g help --task
>>>> pullPluginSource". You get what it does but not how to do it (syntax).
>>>>
>>>> Of course you can open the README.md file and look for reference but
>>>> that's tedious and counter-intuitive.
>>>>
>>>> Would you agree to add the syntax in descriptions of tasks with
>>>> parameters
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
Locked
