Administrator
|
Hi,
Currently the plugins branch has no means to create Javadoc, nor any others actually (not Gradle there) If we want the Plugins to be a real apart product should we not worry about that? Thanks Jacques |
Too early and too messy to worry about it at the moment. The plugins
require a lot of refactoring work and some plugins need to be deleted altogether (ebaystore, ebay, etc ..). Just run ./gradlew javadoc and observe how many problems are there. To have any real value of JavaDocs, we need to cleanup the docs in the first place. Most of the JavaDocs in our java code base are either a) non-existent or b) poorly formatted for javadoc output. I for one never use any javadocs to investigate the code base because I know right now it's not very reliable and you have to dig through the code to get a real understanding. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the plugins branch has no means to create Javadoc, nor any > others actually (not Gradle there) > > If we want the Plugins to be a real apart product should we not worry > about that? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > |
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Is the entire repo a product? Or are the individual components?
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the plugins branch has no means to create Javadoc, nor any > others actually (not Gradle there) > > If we want the Plugins to be a real apart product should we not worry > about that? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > |
Administrator
|
It's not yet clear to me, but I guess at 99% the entire branch (only ASF has a repo, not products they have only branches)
Managing plugins as separated products would be a real pain for the release manager. Except if we can delegate... Jacques Le 20/03/2017 à 13:19, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Is the entire repo a product? Or are the individual components? > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently the plugins branch has no means to create Javadoc, nor any >> others actually (not Gradle there) >> >> If we want the Plugins to be a real apart product should we not worry >> about that? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> |
We could take a hint from the Apache Commons project.
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > It's not yet clear to me, but I guess at 99% the entire branch (only ASF > has a repo, not products they have only branches) > > Managing plugins as separated products would be a real pain for the > release manager. Except if we can delegate... > > Jacques > > > Le 20/03/2017 à 13:19, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> Is the entire repo a product? Or are the individual components? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> >> OFBiz based solutions & services >> >> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace >> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >> >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> Currently the plugins branch has no means to create Javadoc, nor any >>> others actually (not Gradle there) >>> >>> If we want the Plugins to be a real apart product should we not worry >>> about that? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by taher
OK, let's wait
Jacques Le 20/03/2017 à 13:12, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : > Too early and too messy to worry about it at the moment. The plugins > require a lot of refactoring work and some plugins need to be deleted > altogether (ebaystore, ebay, etc ..). Just run ./gradlew javadoc and > observe how many problems are there. > > To have any real value of JavaDocs, we need to cleanup the docs in the > first place. Most of the JavaDocs in our java code base are either a) > non-existent or b) poorly formatted for javadoc output. I for one never use > any javadocs to investigate the code base because I know right now it's not > very reliable and you have to dig through the code to get a real > understanding. > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently the plugins branch has no means to create Javadoc, nor any >> others actually (not Gradle there) >> >> If we want the Plugins to be a real apart product should we not worry >> about that? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |