Hi All,
In TaxAuthority Entity, I see NY_UTF, CA_BOE and UT_TAXMAN(any state except NY & CA). Why do we have 3 different names after the underscore "_" ?. What does UTF, BOE & TAXMAN stands for? Your help is really appreciated. Thank you. |
Hi su2,
If you see the records in the party entity of the same party, they all are of type PartyGroups in role of TAX_AUTHORITY. Here the partyId field (pk in Party entity) is self explain its purpose, The first half is the state name and another half is the company name (not exactly but we can say). Now the key says that company in which state. If you see the relationship of the TaxAuthority then its PK is composite key of the geoId and partyId from the Geo and Party entity. Finally we can say that, These are the partyIds which are doing business in particular state. Hope it helps !!! Rishi Solanki Enterprise Software Developer HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, su2 <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > In TaxAuthority Entity, I see NY_UTF, CA_BOE and UT_TAXMAN(any state except > NY & CA). Why do we have 3 different names after the underscore "_" ?. What > does UTF, BOE & TAXMAN stands for? > > Your help is really appreciated. > > Thank you. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/TaxAuthority-Entity-tp25024881p25024881.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > |
Any other view ????
Rishi Solanki Enterprise Software Developer HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Rishi Solanki <[hidden email]>wrote: > Hi su2, > If you see the records in the party entity of the same party, they all are > of type PartyGroups in role of TAX_AUTHORITY. > Here the partyId field (pk in Party entity) is self explain its purpose, > The first half is the state name and another half is the company name (not > exactly but we can say). > Now the key says that company in which state. If you see the relationship > of the TaxAuthority then its PK is composite key of the geoId and partyId > from the Geo and Party entity. Finally we can say that, These are the > partyIds which are doing business in particular state. > > Hope it helps !!! > > Rishi Solanki > Enterprise Software Developer > HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, su2 <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> In TaxAuthority Entity, I see NY_UTF, CA_BOE and UT_TAXMAN(any state >> except >> NY & CA). Why do we have 3 different names after the underscore "_" ?. >> What >> does UTF, BOE & TAXMAN stands for? >> >> Your help is really appreciated. >> >> Thank you. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/TaxAuthority-Entity-tp25024881p25024881.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > |
In reply to this post by su2
Shuchi,
The field you are talking about is taxAuthPartyId. So, NY_DTF, CA_BOE and UT_TAXMAN are partyId's for PartyGroups corresponding to the Government entity responsibly for taxation in that particular state. For example, the government entity which does taxation in New York (NY) is Department of Tax and Finance (DTF), which explains the term NY_DTF. Similarly, Board of Equalization (BOE) is responsible for taxation in California (CA), hence CA_BOE. -- Thanks & Regards Mridul Pathak Hotwax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com [hidden email] On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, su2 <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > In TaxAuthority Entity, I see NY_UTF, CA_BOE and UT_TAXMAN(any state except > NY & CA). Why do we have 3 different names after the underscore "_" ?. What > does UTF, BOE & TAXMAN stands for? > > Your help is really appreciated. > > Thank you. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/TaxAuthority-Entity-tp25024881p25024881.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > |
In reply to this post by Rishi Solanki
Hi Rishi,
Thank you for your explanation. So that means let say I create/change NY partyID in Party Entity from NY_DTF to NY_ABC, and changing taxAuthPartyId in TaxAuthority entitiy to NY_ABC, there should not be any issue right? (what I understood is, its just the matter of how we name partyID in Party Entity. Correct?) Thanks. su-
|
In reply to this post by Mridul Pathak-2
Perfect Mridul, Thank you so much. It is clear now. And I suppose for other states its TAXMAN as generic name.
Thank you.
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |