Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account, when
i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal? 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > Signing request... 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > Sending request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/transactionProcessor 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > Waiting for status... 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY > decision=REJECT requestID=1349369350570169622529 ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102 ccAuthReply_avsCode=2 reasonCode=102 CJ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users |
I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from
Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are. Andy On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote: > Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account, > when > i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal? > > > 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > > Signing > request... > 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > > Sending > request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ > transactionProcessor > 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > > Waiting > for status... > 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY > > decision=REJECT > requestID=1349369350570169622529 > ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102 > ccAuthReply_avsCode=2 > reasonCode=102 > > CJ > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users |
In reply to this post by Charles Johnson-2
Hi All,
What is the recommended test framework for unit testing. It is being noted that a JXUnits based framework component viz. 'tests' is available. However, doesn't seems an active approach as no latest details (after feb-march 2004) found on the usage of this component by OFBiz community. What is the preferable approach for testing in Context? Is JXUnit is preferable over Cactus? Are we looking for Cactus based test framework, particularly for testing in Context? regards, -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of A. Zeneski Sent: 19 December 2005 19:30 To: OFBiz Users / Usage Discussion Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Cybersource testing I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are. Andy On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote: > Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account, > when > i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal? > > > 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > > Signing > request... > 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > > Sending > request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ > transactionProcessor > 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > > Waiting > for status... > 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY > > decision=REJECT > requestID=1349369350570169622529 > ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102 > ccAuthReply_avsCode=2 > reasonCode=102 > > CJ > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users |
There are quite a few mailing list posts about this, especially in the dev mailing list. Here is one message that has some helpful information: http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/htdig/dev/2004-December/007343.html Some good search terms would include "pushtotest", "httpunit", "junit", and so on. As explained in these messages we have recommended tools for creating tests at pretty much every level in the OFBiz framework, but we still don't have anything to tie them all together and easily run a big batch of all tests combined. Hopefully that will be coming in the near future, but I don't know of any firm plans or sponsorship for it yet... -David On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:49 AM, <[hidden email]> <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi All, > > What is the recommended test framework for unit testing. It is > being noted that a JXUnits based framework component viz. 'tests' > is available. However, doesn't seems an active approach as no > latest details (after feb-march 2004) found on the usage of this > component by OFBiz community. > > What is the preferable approach for testing in Context? Is JXUnit > is preferable over Cactus? Are we looking for Cactus based test > framework, particularly for testing in Context? > > regards, > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of A. Zeneski > Sent: 19 December 2005 19:30 > To: OFBiz Users / Usage Discussion > Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Cybersource testing > > > I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from > Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the > cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it > declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are. > > Andy > > On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote: > >> Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account, >> when >> i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal? >> >> >> 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > >> Signing >> request... >> 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > >> Sending >> request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ >> transactionProcessor >> 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > >> Waiting >> for status... >> 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY > >> decision=REJECT >> requestID=1349369350570169622529 >> ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102 >> ccAuthReply_avsCode=2 >> reasonCode=102 >> >> CJ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Andrew Zeneski
Thanks Andy. I'll try to combine the necessary parameters into my test
order. CJ A. Zeneski wrote: > I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from > Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the > cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it > declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are. > > Andy > > On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote: > >> Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account, when >> i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal? >> >> >> 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > Signing >> request... >> 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > Sending >> request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ transactionProcessor >> 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO > Waiting >> for status... >> 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY > >> decision=REJECT >> requestID=1349369350570169622529 >> ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102 >> ccAuthReply_avsCode=2 >> reasonCode=102 >> >> CJ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |