Users - Cybersource testing

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Users - Cybersource testing

Charles Johnson-2
Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account, when
i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal?


2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     > Signing
request...
2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     > Sending
request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/transactionProcessor
2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     > Waiting
for status...
2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY    >
decision=REJECT
requestID=1349369350570169622529
ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102
ccAuthReply_avsCode=2
reasonCode=102

CJ

 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Users - Cybersource testing

Andrew Zeneski
I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from  
Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the  
cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it  
declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are.

Andy

On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote:

> Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account,  
> when
> i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal?
>
>
> 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  
> Signing
> request...
> 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  
> Sending
> request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ 
> transactionProcessor
> 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  
> Waiting
> for status...
> 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY    >
> decision=REJECT
> requestID=1349369350570169622529
> ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102
> ccAuthReply_avsCode=2
> reasonCode=102
>
> CJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Users - Cybersource testing

jitender.garg
In reply to this post by Charles Johnson-2
Hi All,

What is the recommended test framework for unit testing. It is being noted that a JXUnits based framework component viz. 'tests' is available. However, doesn't seems an active approach as no latest details (after feb-march 2004) found on the usage of this component by OFBiz community.

What is the preferable approach for testing in Context? Is JXUnit is preferable over Cactus? Are we looking for Cactus based test framework, particularly for testing in Context?

regards,



-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of A. Zeneski
Sent: 19 December 2005 19:30
To: OFBiz Users / Usage Discussion
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Cybersource testing


I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from  
Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the  
cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it  
declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are.

Andy

On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote:

> Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account,  
> when
> i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal?
>
>
> 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  
> Signing
> request...
> 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  
> Sending
> request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ 
> transactionProcessor
> 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  
> Waiting
> for status...
> 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY    >
> decision=REJECT
> requestID=1349369350570169622529
> ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102
> ccAuthReply_avsCode=2
> reasonCode=102
>
> CJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Users - Cybersource testing

David E. Jones

There are quite a few mailing list posts about this, especially in  
the dev mailing list. Here is one message that has some helpful  
information:

http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/htdig/dev/2004-December/007343.html

Some good search terms would include "pushtotest", "httpunit",  
"junit", and so on.

As explained in these messages we have recommended tools for creating  
tests at pretty much every level in the OFBiz framework, but we still  
don't have anything to tie them all together and easily run a big  
batch of all tests combined. Hopefully that will be coming in the  
near future, but I don't know of any firm plans or sponsorship for it  
yet...

-David


On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:49 AM, <[hidden email]>  
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> What is the recommended test framework for unit testing. It is  
> being noted that a JXUnits based framework component viz. 'tests'  
> is available. However, doesn't seems an active approach as no  
> latest details (after feb-march 2004) found on the usage of this  
> component by OFBiz community.
>
> What is the preferable approach for testing in Context? Is JXUnit  
> is preferable over Cactus? Are we looking for Cactus based test  
> framework, particularly for testing in Context?
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of A. Zeneski
> Sent: 19 December 2005 19:30
> To: OFBiz Users / Usage Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Cybersource testing
>
>
> I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from
> Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the
> cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it
> declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are.
>
> Andy
>
> On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote:
>
>> Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account,
>> when
>> i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal?
>>
>>
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >
>> Signing
>> request...
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >
>> Sending
>> request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/
>> transactionProcessor
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >
>> Waiting
>> for status...
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY    >
>> decision=REJECT
>> requestID=1349369350570169622529
>> ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102
>> ccAuthReply_avsCode=2
>> reasonCode=102
>>
>> CJ
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Users - Cybersource testing

Charles Johnson-2
In reply to this post by Andrew Zeneski
Thanks Andy. I'll try to combine the necessary parameters into my test
order.

CJ

A. Zeneski wrote:

> I think there are a few different ways to get certain responses from
> Cybersource. If I remember correctly (you will need to consult the
> cybersource documentation) if the order amount is more than X it
> declines otherwise it approves. Cannot remember what the values are.
>
> Andy
>
> On Dec 18, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Charles Johnson wrote:
>
>> Seemingly, irrespective of the info i put into my testing account,  when
>> i attempt a 'purchase' this is what i get. Is this normal?
>>
>>
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:27.492 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  Signing
>> request...
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:28.994 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  Sending
>> request to https://ics2wstest.ic3.com/commerce/1.x/ transactionProcessor
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:29.024 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 INFO     >  Waiting
>> for status...
>> 2005-12-18 20:15:30.877 http-0.0.0.0-8443-Processor4 REPLY    >
>> decision=REJECT
>> requestID=1349369350570169622529
>> ccAuthReply_reasonCode=102
>> ccAuthReply_avsCode=2
>> reasonCode=102
>>
>> CJ
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>

 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users