Users - Security groups - error adding user login
Locked
Users - Security groups - error adding user login
 
|
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
In reply to this post by bjc
I've been meaning to comment on this mail for some time. I was wondering how people use the
different parties, particularly in relation to each other? For example a given company party may have employees who might be customers as well. I can understand how these would be set up using relationships but was wondering if there was a situation where a 'company' might have a login and what scenarios this might occur in? Would it be more appropriate to create new persons and they would then have access to the companies information? I guess what I'm asking is rather than having the ability to create a user login id for the company would it be better practise to allocate this capability to a user (or users)? I attach a screenshot of the page that I'm talking about. Since a 'company' isn't a person it can't really login although it could have orders, roles, etc., which need to be tracked. If there is only one login available (which this screen seems to suggest) then ordering is made difficult (it has to be either done centrally or the login needs to be shared). If the customer creates their own account then there is no way of working out how much the company may have bought in total. Or is this dealt with by relationships as well? Could anyone share their experiences in relation to this? My reason is that we have historically all of our customers have had 'personal' accounts and they purchased using these. We have recently been approached by larger, multi departmental organisations who want to amalgamate all their purchasing (getting better discounts) but want the actual purchasing to be handled by discrete units (without a shared login). It seems likely that this functionality is available immediately but I am unsure how to implement it. Thanks and very best wishes Ian On Fri, March 17, 2006 22:58, Benjamin Cox wrote: > Jacopo, > > > Thanks for trying, but unfortunately your guess is incorrect. I did > set up a user login, and even logged in a few times, before trying to associate the new > permissions. I ultimately was able to make it work by doing it from the User Login -> Security > screen, but the buglet in my original approach could probably stand further investigation. I'm > probably not effective enough at ofbiz debugging just yet to volunteer, I'm afraid... that is, not > without some guidance :-) > > David - to your point, I'm sure the ID is a valid one, but whether of > the right entity I'm not sure. Could I perhaps have been entering the party ID when it needed a > User Login ID or something? > > > Thank you both for responding, > > > Ben > > > --- > HotWax Media (www.hotwaxmedia.com) > Ben Cox > Director of Technology > > > On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:02 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> >> my guess is that you have created the new party (10030) but you have not created a user login for >> it. You can create user logins for parties from the party detail page. >> Then you have to associate permissions to the party login id, not >> to the party id to which the login is associated. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> >> Benjamin Cox wrote: >> >>> I got the error you can see below while trying to add my new Employee >>> party to the Security Group "BIZADMIN". This seems to indicate a lookup table needs a record >>> and isn't getting it in time to satisfy Derby. >>> >>> >>> This is an out-of-the-SVN-box install with no real custom mods as of >>> yet. I'm just trying to figure out how much admin interface people get when they have various >>> permissions, but it's hard if I can't assign them to security groups. That is, unless I'm >>> completely missing the point, which is always possible. >>> >>> Any help would be, well... helpful. I think it's probably a need for >>> a service injected between the initiating action and the offending service to write the lookup >>> table record. Any light you can shed on whether this guess is out to lunch would also help... >>> is it a deeper problem at the entity engine level, or am I on the right track? >>> >>> Thanks much, >>> >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> ERROR: Could not complete the Add UserLogin To SecurityGroup [file:/ >>> home/bjc/sandbox/ofbiz/applications/securityext/script/org/ofbiz/ securityext/securitygroup/ >>> SecurityGroupServices.xml#addUserLoginToSecurityGroup] process >>> [problem creating the newEntity value: Exception while inserting the >>> following entity: [GenericEntity:UserLoginSecurityGroup] [createdStamp, >>> 2006-03-17 04:43:05.519(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp, >>> 2006-03-17 04:43:05.487(java.sql.Timestamp)][fromDate,2006-03-16 >>> 04:42:35.38(java.sql.Timestamp)][groupId,BIZADMIN(java.lang.String)] >>> [lastUpdatedStamp,2006-03-17 04:43:05.519(java.sql.Timestamp)] >>> [lastUpdatedTxStamp,2006-03-17 04:43:05.487(java.sql.Timestamp)] >>> [thruDate,null()][userLoginId,10030(java.lang.String)] (while >>> inserting: [GenericEntity:UserLoginSecurityGroup][createdStamp, >>> 2006-03-17 04:43:05.519(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp, >>> 2006-03-17 04:43:05.487(java.sql.Timestamp)][fromDate,2006-03-16 >>> 04:42:35.38(java.sql.Timestamp)][groupId,BIZADMIN(java.lang.String)] >>> [lastUpdatedStamp,2006-03-17 04:43:05.519(java.sql.Timestamp)] >>> [lastUpdatedTxStamp,2006-03-17 04:43:05.487(java.sql.Timestamp)] >>> [thruDate,null()][userLoginId,10030(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception >>> while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.USER_LOGIN_SECURITY_GROUP (USER_LOGIN_ID, >>> GROUP_ID, FROM_DATE, >>> THRU_DATE, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, >>> CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table >>> 'USER_LOGIN_SECURITY_GROUP' caused a violation of foreign key >>> constraint 'USER_SECGRP_USER' for key (10030). The statement has been rolled back.)))] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Ian Gilbert www.ethicalshopper.net Fair trade: the alternative choice for your everyday shopping 0845 456 2429 WHAT DO YOU DRINK AT WORK? We can supply your organisation with high quality fair trade tea and coffee. Discounts are available for regular orders. Contact us for more details. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users |
CompanyLogin.png (11K)
Re: Users - Security groups - error adding user login
|
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |