Login  Register

[VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options Options
Embed post
Permalink
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

[VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

David E Jones
1775 posts

This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the  
OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from  
using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the  
standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even  
as a way to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using  
simple-methods).

This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but  
does have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a  
vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best  
decision possible.

Please vote:

[+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
[+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
[-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy

Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.

-David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Scott Gray
986 posts
+1

Scott

2008/5/21 David E Jones <[hidden email]>:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the OFBiz
> best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using Beanshell
> to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard scripting
> language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way to implement
> services (as a secondary best practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but does
> have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a vote should
> help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is welcome
> to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Jacopo Cappellato-3
569 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

Jacopo

PS: I have also drafted out a migration script to rename files (.bsh -
 > .groovy).


On May 21, 2008, at 10:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
> the OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  
> from using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  
> Groovy the standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is  
> needed, even as a way to implement services (as a secondary best  
> practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
> but does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  
> so a vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  
> the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  
> binding.
>
> -David
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Luke Grose
1 post
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the
> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using
> Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard
> scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way
> to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using
> simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but
> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a
> vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best
> decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
17869 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

Jacques

From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the  
> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from  
> using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the  
> standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even  
> as a way to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using  
> simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but  
> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a  
> vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best  
> decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Christian Geisert
250 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
David E Jones schrieb:
>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the
> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using
> Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard
> scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way
> to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using
> simple-methods).

+1

Christian
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

byersa
323 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1
-Al

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:08 AM, David E Jones <[hidden email]>
wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the OFBiz
> best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using Beanshell
> to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard scripting
> language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way to implement
> services (as a secondary best practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but does
> have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a vote should
> help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is welcome
> to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Anil Patel-3
386 posts
+1

On May 21, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Al Byers wrote:

> +1
> -Al
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:08 AM, David E Jones <[hidden email]
> >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
>> the OFBiz
>> best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using  
>> Beanshell
>> to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard  
>> scripting
>> language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way to  
>> implement
>> services (as a secondary best practice to using simple-methods).
>>
>> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
>> but does
>> have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a  
>> vote should
>> help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best decision  
>> possible.
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
>> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
>> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>>
>> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
>> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
>> welcome
>> to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Rodrigo Lima-2
68 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
-1

2008/5/21, David E Jones <[hidden email]>:

>
>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the OFBiz
> best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using Beanshell
> to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard scripting
> language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way to implement
> services (as a secondary best practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but does
> have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a vote should
> help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is welcome
> to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Adrian Crum
2435 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the
> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from using
> Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the standard
> scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even as a way
> to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using
> simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but
> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a
> vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best
> decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Joe Eckard
74 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

On May 21, 2008, at 4:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
> the OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  
> from using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  
> Groovy the standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is  
> needed, even as a way to implement services (as a secondary best  
> practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
> but does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  
> so a vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  
> the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  
> binding.
>
> -David


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Ean Schuessler
296 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
Am I eligible to vote? I guess so!

+1

----- "David E Jones" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the
>
> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from  
> using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the
>
> standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even
>  
> as a way to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using
>
> simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but
>  
> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a
>
> vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best
>
> decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
>
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are
> binding.

--
Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com
[hidden email] - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Tim Ruppert
1151 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

On May 21, 2008, at 2:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
> the OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  
> from using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  
> Groovy the standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is  
> needed, even as a way to implement services (as a secondary best  
> practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
> but does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  
> so a vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  
> the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  
> binding.
>
> -David
>


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Ray Barlow
202 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing the
> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts from
> using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making Groovy the
> standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is needed, even
> as a way to implement services (as a secondary best practice to using
> simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on, but
> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved, so a
> vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward the best
> decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are binding.
>
> -David
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Andrew Zeneski-2
101 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

On May 21, 2008, at 1:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
> the OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  
> from using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  
> Groovy the standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is  
> needed, even as a way to implement services (as a secondary best  
> practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
> but does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  
> so a vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  
> the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  
> binding.
>
> -David
>


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Nicolas Malin
2 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

On May 21, 2008, at 1:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
> the OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  
> from using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  
> Groovy the standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is  
> needed, even as a way to implement services (as a secondary best  
> practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
> but does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  
> so a vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  
> the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  
> binding.
>
> -David
>


--
MALIN Nicolas
Trésorier de l'association Néogia
Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
http://www.neogia.org/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

Ashish Vijaywargiya
737 posts
+1

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On May 21, 2008, at 1:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:
>
>
>> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  the
>> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  from using
>> Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  Groovy the standard
>> scripting language wherever generic scripting is  needed, even as a way to
>> implement services (as a secondary best  practice to using simple-methods).
>>
>> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  but
>> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  so a vote
>> should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  the best decision
>> possible.
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
>> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
>> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>>
>> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
>>  comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is
>>  welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  binding.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
> --
> MALIN Nicolas
> Trésorier de l'association Néogia
> Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
> http://www.neogia.org/
>



--
Thanks & Regards
Ashish Vijaywargiya
+919893479711
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

mrisaliti@libero.it
215 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones
+1

> +1
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On May 21, 2008, at 1:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> >> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  the
> >> OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  from using
> >> Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  Groovy the standard
> >> scripting language wherever generic scripting is  needed, even as a way to
> >> implement services (as a secondary best  practice to using simple-methods).
> >>
> >> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  but
> >> does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  so a vote
> >> should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  the best decision
> >> possible.
> >>
> >> Please vote:
> >>
> >> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> >> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> >> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
> >>
> >> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition
> >>  comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is
> >>  welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  binding.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > MALIN Nicolas
> > Trésorier de l'association Néogia
> > Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
> > http://www.neogia.org/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Ashish Vijaywargiya
> +919893479711
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

[VOTE RESULT] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

David E Jones
1775 posts
In reply to this post by David E Jones

The vote has passed with the following results:

+1 binding: 8
+1 general: 9
-1 general: 1

It looks like there is already a Jira issue to get some conversions  
going... so onward and upward!

I'll start working on the best practices guide and change it according  
to this.

-David


On May 21, 2008, at 2:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing  
> the OFBiz best practice tool for writing data preparation scripts  
> from using Beanshell to using Groovy, and more generally making  
> Groovy the standard scripting language wherever generic scripting is  
> needed, even as a way to implement services (as a secondary best  
> practice to using simple-methods).
>
> This sort of decision is perhaps not totally necessary to vote on,  
> but does have a big impact on the project and many people involved,  
> so a vote should help draw opinions and lead the community toward  
> the best decision possible.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [+1] Yes, replace Beanshell with Groovy
> [+0] I'm not for, but I'm not against
> [-1] No, stick to Beanshell and don't migrate toward Groovy
>
> Many comments were brought up in the discussion thread, but addition  
> comments related to your vote are welcome. As per usual everyone is  
> welcome to vote and express opinions though only PMC votes are  
> binding.
>
> -David
>