[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacopo Cappellato-4
The vote is now closed. Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:

[+1] 7
[-1] 0

The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 6 votes from Erwan, Jacques, Ashish, Scott, Anil, Jacopo

I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the package.

Jacopo
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Christian Geisert
Am 16.11.2012 11:38, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
> The vote is now closed. Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:

Damn, I'm too late ;-)

But anyway, looks good except for "run-tests" which fails on my local
machine (but is successfull on Buildbot) - no time to have a closer look..

so +0 from me

Christian

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacopo Cappellato-4
ouch..interesting.... tests are successful on mine; I would love to get the feedback from others before we announce the release.

Thanks Christian.

Jacopo

On Nov 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:

> Am 16.11.2012 11:38, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>> The vote is now closed. Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
>
> Damn, I'm too late ;-)
>
> But anyway, looks good except for "run-tests" which fails on my local machine (but is successfull on Buildbot) - no time to have a closer look..
>
> so +0 from me
>
> Christian
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Mark Schneider
Hello,
Am 16.11.2012 12:25, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
> ouch..interesting.... tests are successful on mine; I would love to get the feedback from others before we announce the release.
Does OFBiz 11.04.01 include already tomcat 7?

regards, Mark

--
[hidden email]

http://rsync.it-infrastrukturen.org

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacopo Cappellato-4
No, it is bundled with Tomcat 6.0.36

Kind regards,

Jacopo

On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Mark Schneider wrote:

> Hello,
> Am 16.11.2012 12:25, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>> ouch..interesting.... tests are successful on mine; I would love to get the feedback from others before we announce the release.
> Does OFBiz 11.04.01 include already tomcat 7?
>
> regards, Mark
>
> --
> [hidden email]
>
> http://rsync.it-infrastrukturen.org
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Mark Schneider
Thank you Jacopo.

Am 16.11.2012 15:49, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
> No, it is bundled with Tomcat 6.0.36
>
I see that tomcat 7 is first bundled with ofbiz.12.04. Where can I find
description of differences between OFBiz *10.04.04*, *11.04* and *12.04*?

regards, Mark

--
[hidden email]

http://rsync.it-infrastrukturen.org

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
We discussed it this morning with Christian. I believe it's the same with cross sometimes on Builbot and dissapear by itseld (false errors/failure)
It would be good to double-check, but I don't expect a final/defintive result on this.
IIRW, the best we have so far is Adam's invetigation about thread contentions in some rare cases which appear uniquely during tests.

In other words I'd not be too concerned by this issue, but of course fixing it would be a relief.

BTW, Christian which failure/errors did you get exactly?

HTH

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> ouch..interesting.... tests are successful on mine; I would love to get the feedback from others before we announce the release.
>
> Thanks Christian.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Nov 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:
>
>> Am 16.11.2012 11:38, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>>> The vote is now closed. Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
>>
>> Damn, I'm too late ;-)
>>
>> But anyway, looks good except for "run-tests" which fails on my local machine (but is successfull on Buildbot) - no time to have a closer look..
>>
>> so +0 from me
>>
>> Christian
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
Ha, and I forgot, for those interested, you can always check at http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/logs/

Jacques

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> We discussed it this morning with Christian. I believe it's the same with cross sometimes on Builbot and dissapear by itseld
> (false errors/failure)
> It would be good to double-check, but I don't expect a final/defintive result on this.
> IIRW, the best we have so far is Adam's invetigation about thread contentions in some rare cases which appear uniquely during
> tests.
>
> In other words I'd not be too concerned by this issue, but of course fixing it would be a relief.
>
> BTW, Christian which failure/errors did you get exactly?
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>> ouch..interesting.... tests are successful on mine; I would love to get the feedback from others before we announce the release.
>>
>> Thanks Christian.
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.11.2012 11:38, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>>>> The vote is now closed. Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
>>>
>>> Damn, I'm too late ;-)
>>>
>>> But anyway, looks good except for "run-tests" which fails on my local machine (but is successfull on Buildbot) - no time to
>>> have a closer look..
>>>
>>> so +0 from me
>>>
>>> Christian
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Mark Schneider
Here you go:

http://www.apache.org/dist/ofbiz/

12.04 is still not listed there because it is not officially released.
If you are looking at the different features, the best document to look at is:

https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBIZ/main-new-features.html

I hope it helps.

Regards,

Jacopo

On Nov 16, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Mark Schneider wrote:

> Thank you Jacopo.
>
> Am 16.11.2012 15:49, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>> No, it is bundled with Tomcat 6.0.36
>>
> I see that tomcat 7 is first bundled with ofbiz.12.04. Where can I find description of differences between OFBiz *10.04.04*, *11.04* and *12.04*?
>
> regards, Mark
>
> --
> [hidden email]
>
> http://rsync.it-infrastrukturen.org
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 11.04.01

Jacopo Cappellato-4
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
I have downloaded the file from the mirrors and then run the tests again on it and everything was fine; I am going to announce it at this point.

Thanks,

Jacopo

On Nov 16, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> We discussed it this morning with Christian. I believe it's the same with cross sometimes on Builbot and dissapear by itseld (false errors/failure)
> It would be good to double-check, but I don't expect a final/defintive result on this.
> IIRW, the best we have so far is Adam's invetigation about thread contentions in some rare cases which appear uniquely during tests.
>
> In other words I'd not be too concerned by this issue, but of course fixing it would be a relief.
>
> BTW, Christian which failure/errors did you get exactly?
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>> ouch..interesting.... tests are successful on mine; I would love to get the feedback from others before we announce the release.
>>
>> Thanks Christian.
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Christian Geisert wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.11.2012 11:38, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>>>> The vote is now closed. Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:
>>>
>>> Damn, I'm too late ;-)
>>>
>>> But anyway, looks good except for "run-tests" which fails on my local machine (but is successfull on Buildbot) - no time to have a closer look..
>>>
>>> so +0 from me
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>
>>