[VOTE] redefining the components' directory layout for groovy source files

[Nicolas Malin-2]

Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
won't waste his time.

Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference
for the following naming space : A) All groovy script under the same path
src/main/groovy/...
B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
(pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled
Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather
that script because other script languages could be used in the future)
D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq

Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi

I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !

  Cheers,

Nicolas

[Jacopo Cappellato-5]

A) -1
B) +0
C) +1 (if you mean src/main/groovy and src/main/groovyScripts

Jacopo

PS: I also like the "Obi-Wan Kenobi" proposal!

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
> help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
> won't waste his time.
>
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
> but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
> the following naming space : A) All groovy script under the same path
> src/main/groovy/...
> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled
> Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather that
> script because other script languages could be used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
> message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>

[Pierre Smits]

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Nicolas Malin <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
> help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
> won't waste his time.
>
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
> but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
> the following naming space :
>

>
>    - A) All groovy script under the same path: src/main/groovy/...
>    - B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this
>    src/main/groovy/... (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed
>    Groovy scripts)
>
>

> C) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts,
> groovyScripts rather that script because other script languages could be
> used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
> message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>

[Julien NICOLAS]

A) 0
B) 0
C) +1

Julien.

PS : For D) I was thinking about Georges Abitbol but not sure that it
could be better than C)


Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need
> to help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and
> that he won't waste his time.
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang
> files but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your
> preference for the following naming space : A) All groovy script under
> the same path
> src/main/groovy/...
> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts,
> groovyScripts rather that script because other script languages could
> be used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin
> Jacopo's message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

A) -1
B) +0
C) +1 (as I said at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?focusedCommentId=15110699 we need to keep the Java package name way to avoid file names collisions when using the "component://" notation (in screens)

Jacques


Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
> won't waste his time.
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
> the following naming space :

> A) All groovy script under the same path src/main/groovy/...
> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/... (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts)
> C) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather
> that script because other script languages could be used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>

[Deepak Dixit-3]

A)  -1
B)  0
C) +1

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> A) -1
> B) +0
> C) +1 (as I said at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?focusedCommentId=15110699
> we need to keep the Java package name way to avoid file names collisions
> when using the "component://" notation (in screens)
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>
>> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
>> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
>> help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
>> won't waste his time.
>>
>> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
>> but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
>> the following naming space :
>>
>
> A) All groovy script under the same path src/main/groovy/...
>> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
>> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
>> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled
>> Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather that
>> script because other script languages could be used in the future)
>> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
>> message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>>
>> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
>> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>>
>> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>>
>>  Cheers,
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>

[Nicolas Malin-2]

A) 0
B) 0
C) +1

Remind, 2 days before closure for the stragglers :)

Nicolas

Le 30/01/2016 06:52, Deepak Dixit a écrit :

> A)  -1
> B)  0
> C) +1
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
> www.hotwaxsystems.com
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> A) -1
>> B) +0
>> C) +1 (as I said at
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?focusedCommentId=15110699
>> we need to keep the Java package name way to avoid file names collisions
>> when using the "component://" notation (in screens)
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>
>>> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
>>> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
>>> help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
>>> won't waste his time.
>>>
>>> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
>>> but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
>>> the following naming space :
>>>
>> A) All groovy script under the same path src/main/groovy/...
>>> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
>>> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
>>> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled
>>> Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather that
>>> script because other script languages could be used in the future)
>>> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
>>> message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>>>
>>> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
>>> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>>>
>>> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>>>
>>>   Cheers,
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>>

[Michael Brohl-3]

A) -1
B) +0
C) +1

Regards,

Michael

Am 29.01.16 um 10:22 schrieb Nicolas Malin:

> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need
> to help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and
> that he won't waste his time.
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang
> files but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your
> preference for the following naming space : A) All groovy script under
> the same path
> src/main/groovy/...
> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts,
> groovyScripts rather that script because other script languages could
> be used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin
> Jacopo's message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>

[Gil Portenseigne]

Thanks for the reminder,

A)  -1
B)  +0
C) +1

Gil

On 11/02/2016 22:26, Nicolas Malin wrote:

A) 0
B) 0
C) +1

Remind, 2 days before closure for the stragglers :)

Nicolas

Le 30/01/2016 06:52, Deepak Dixit a écrit :

A)  -1
B)  0
C) +1

Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

A) -1
B) +0
C) +1 (as I said at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810?focusedCommentId=15110699
we need to keep the Java package name way to avoid file names collisions
when using the "component://" notation (in screens)

Jacques


Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need to
help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and that he
won't waste his time.

Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang files
but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your preference for
the following naming space :

A) All groovy script under the same path src/main/groovy/...

B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
(pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/... (pre-compiled
Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts, groovyScripts rather that
script because other script languages could be used in the future)
D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin Jacopo's
message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq

Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi

I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !

  Cheers,

Nicolas

[Nicolas Malin-2]

Without surprise the result is C) !

Total are :
A) -5
B) 0
C) +7
D) No other proposition so (go away Kenobi)

Tanks all for your vote :)

Cheers,
Nicolas

Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need
> to help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and
> that he won't waste his time.
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang
> files but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your
> preference for the following naming space : A) All groovy script under
> the same path
> src/main/groovy/...
> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts,
> groovyScripts rather that script because other script languages could
> be used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin
> Jacopo's message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>

[Nicolas Malin-2]

Without surprise the result is C) !

Total are :
A) -5
B) 0
C) +7
D) No other proposition so (go away Kenobi)

Tanks all for your vote :)

Cheers,
Nicolas

Le 29/01/2016 10:22, Nicolas Malin a écrit :

> Hello girls and guys, On the thread continuity
> http://markmail.org/message/dg5s457lfx2gr6gn, Pierre open the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6810it's fine and we need
> to help him to ensure that his work could be committed on trunk and
> that he won't waste his time.
>
> Regard to the issue, we have no problem for the java and minilang
> files but the groovy need a community decision. Please give your
> preference for the following naming space : A) All groovy script under
> the same path
> src/main/groovy/...
> B) Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this src/main/groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) src/main/scripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts) C)
> Separate Groovy compiled and scripted like this groovy/...
> (pre-compiled Groovy) groovyScripts/... (parsed Groovy scripts,
> groovyScripts rather that script because other script languages could
> be used in the future)
> D) other if you have an ingenious idea Keep in mind the origin
> Jacopo's message http://markmail.org/message/swzttrevkn3uofbq
>
> Just response like that A) +1 or 0 or -1
> B) +1 or 0 or -1 C) +1 or 0 or -1 D) Obi-Wan Kenobi
>
> I will close this vote the 14/02/16, thanks for your time !
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Nicolas
>