Voting for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

This is not a formal vote yet.
Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).

I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.

Kind regards,

Jacopo

[Jacques Le Roux]

Sounds good to me

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> This is not a formal vote yet.
> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this
> point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes
> will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>
> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>

[BJ Freeman]

I have run 10.4 for some time and it has traffic from the search bots.
once we added the -XX:MaxPermSize=512m problems on my server stopped.
so +1

BTW what ever happened to a 9.04.1

=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 12/16/2010 1:17 AM:

> This is not a formal vote yet.
> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>
> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>

[Adam Heath-2]

On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> This is not a formal vote yet.
> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>
> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.

I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new
year.  This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have
spare time to think about this.

[Adam Heath-2]

On 12/16/2010 11:45 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> I have run 10.4 for some time and it has traffic from the search bots.
> once we added the -XX:MaxPermSize=512m problems on my server stopped.
> so +1

Really?  That sounds like a bug to me.  Server stoppage is a bad thing.

[BJ Freeman]

oops
meant adding it fixed the server stopping.

=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man


Adam Heath sent the following on 12/16/2010 9:55 AM:
> On 12/16/2010 11:45 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>> I have run 10.4 for some time and it has traffic from the search bots.
>> once we added the -XX:MaxPermSize=512m problems on my server stopped.
>> so +1
>
> Really? That sounds like a bug to me. Server stoppage is a bad thing.
>

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

Are we ready to discuss about this now?

Jacopo

On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:

> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>
>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>
> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.  This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to think about this.

[Young Gu]

Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still
09.04, how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?

Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.

Thanks&  Best Regards,

Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com


On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>
>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.  This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to think about this.

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

As soon as we will vote for the release and the release will be officially issued, it will be available in the download page.

Kind regards,

Jacopo

On Jan 4, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Young Gu wrote:

> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04, how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>
> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>
> Thanks&  Best Regards,
>
> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>
>
> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.  This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to think about this.

[BJ Freeman]

https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/release-plan.html



=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Young Gu sent the following on 1/4/2011 8:19 AM:

> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still
> 09.04, how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>
> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>
> Thanks& Best Regards,
>
> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>
>
> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official
>>>> release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable
>>>> enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this
>>>> point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04",
>>>> in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will
>>>> then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz
>>>> 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new
>>> year. This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have
>>> spare time to think about this.
>

[Adrian Crum]

On 1/4/2011 8:26 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> As soon as we will vote for the release and the release will be officially issued, it will be available in the download page.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Young Gu wrote:
>
>> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04, how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>>
>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>
>> Thanks&   Best Regards,
>>
>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough, we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.  This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to think about this.
>
>

[Pierre Smits]

Hi All,

+1 on the new release.

But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is
already long gone.

Regards,

Pierre

2011/1/4 Young Gu <[hidden email]>

> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04,
> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>
> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>
> Thanks&  Best Regards,
>
> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>
>
>
> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>  On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release
>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough,
>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it
>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it
>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix
>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>>
>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.
>>>  This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to
>>> think about this.
>>>
>>

[Young Gu]

IMHO, follow the general version convention should be better, such as
10.0,10.1,10.5, 11.0 ....

Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.

Thanks & Best Regards .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Young Gu | Software Engineer | http://www.infor.com


On 1/5/2011 3:18 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> +1 on the new release.
>
> But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is
> already long gone.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
> 2011/1/4 Young Gu<[hidden email]>
>
>> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04,
>> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>>
>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>
>> Thanks&   Best Regards,
>>
>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
>>>   On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release
>>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough,
>>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it
>>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it
>>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix
>>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
>>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>>>
>>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.
>>>>   This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to
>>>> think about this.
>>>>

[Jacques Le Roux]

This has been already discussed and I don't think we will change our plan
Please read https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/release-plan.html

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Young Gu" <[hidden email]>

> IMHO, follow the general version convention should be better, such as
> 10.0,10.1,10.5, 11.0 ....
>
> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>
> Thanks & Best Regards .
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Young Gu | Software Engineer | http://www.infor.com
>
>
> On 1/5/2011 3:18 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> +1 on the new release.
>>
>> But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is
>> already long gone.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>> 2011/1/4 Young Gu<[hidden email]>
>>
>>> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04,
>>> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>>>
>>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>>
>>> Thanks&   Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release
>>>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough,
>>>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it
>>>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it
>>>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix
>>>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
>>>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.
>>>>>   This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to
>>>>> think about this.
>>>>>
>

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> +1 on the new release.
>
> But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is
> already long gone.

The name 2010-04 is actually the date when the feature freeze happened: after that date only bug fixes have been committed to the 10.04 branch, not new features.

Jacopo

>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
> 2011/1/4 Young Gu <[hidden email]>
>
>> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04,
>> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>>
>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>
>> Thanks&  Best Regards,
>>
>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release
>>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough,
>>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it
>>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it
>>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix
>>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
>>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>>>
>>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.
>>>> This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to
>>>> think about this.
>>>>
>>>

[Young Gu]

Okay, it's just curious, 2011 is here, but we release with version
10.04, just a little strange. Anyway, it doesn't matter, 10.04 is also OK.

Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.

Thanks & Best Regards .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Young Gu | Software Engineer | http://www.infor.com


On 1/5/2011 5:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> This has been already discussed and I don't think we will change our plan
> Please read https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/release-plan.html
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Young Gu" <[hidden email]>
>> IMHO, follow the general version convention should be better, such as
>> 10.0,10.1,10.5, 11.0 ....
>>
>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>
>> Thanks & Best Regards .
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | http://www.infor.com
>>
>>
>> On 1/5/2011 3:18 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> +1 on the new release.
>>>
>>> But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010,
>>> month 04) is
>>> already long gone.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> 2011/1/4 Young Gu<[hidden email]>
>>>
>>>> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still
>>>> 09.04,
>>>> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>>>>
>>>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks&   Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable
>>>>>>> enough,
>>>>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I
>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to
>>>>>>> consider it
>>>>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in
>>>>>>> future bug fix
>>>>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz
>>>>>>> 10.04.02"...).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the
>>>>>>> week, so
>>>>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the
>>>>>> new year.
>>>>>>   This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have
>>>>>> spare time to
>>>>>> think about this.
>>>>>>
>>
>

[Young Gu]

Oh, got it, this sound reasonable, thanks!  :-)

Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.

Thanks & Best Regards .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Young Gu | Software Engineer | http://www.infor.com


On 1/5/2011 5:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> +1 on the new release.
>>
>> But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is
>> already long gone.
> The name 2010-04 is actually the date when the feature freeze happened: after that date only bug fixes have been committed to the 10.04 branch, not new features.
>
> Jacopo
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>> 2011/1/4 Young Gu<[hidden email]>
>>
>>> Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04,
>>> how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
>>>
>>> Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
>>>
>>> Thanks&   Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are we ready to discuss about this now?
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>>> This is not a formal vote yet.
>>>>>> Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release
>>>>>> of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
>>>>>> If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough,
>>>>>> we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it
>>>>>> will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it
>>>>>> our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix
>>>>>> releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
>>>>>> please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.
>>>>> This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to
>>>>> think about this.
>>>>>