buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

[buildbot]

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2234

Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/

Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu

Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894956
Blamelist: jonesde

BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1

sincerely,
 -The ASF Buildbot

[David E. Jones-2]

Is there any way to get more details about this?

Evidently I'm to blame for a compile failure... but my last commit that involves something to be compiled was on Dec 27 in rev 894047.

Or does the blame list just look at the most recent commit even though the test may have included various commits since the last test?

-David


On Dec 31, 2009, at 6:39 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2234
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>
> Build Reason:
> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894956
> Blamelist: jonesde
>
> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>
> sincerely,
> -The ASF Buildbot
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Hi David,

It's only tests that are failing http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2234/steps/compile_1/logs/stdio
You can see it looking through the stdio link in the red block

Or were you looking for something else? What do you call test below?

Jacques


From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>

>
> Is there any way to get more details about this?
>
> Evidently I'm to blame for a compile failure... but my last commit that involves something to be compiled was on Dec 27 in rev
> 894047.
>
> Or does the blame list just look at the most recent commit even though the test may have included various commits since the last
> test?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Dec 31, 2009, at 6:39 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2234
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>
>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>
>> Build Reason:
>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894956
>> Blamelist: jonesde
>>
>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>>
>> sincerely,
>> -The ASF Buildbot
>>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

On 1/01/2010, at 1:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> Is there any way to get more details about this?

The stdio links are all we have at the moment

>
> Evidently I'm to blame for a compile failure... but my last commit  
> that involves something to be compiled was on Dec 27 in rev 894047.

It seems a compile failure is reported whenever an ant task fails,  
compile_1 is the run-tests task and based on the stdio output my guess  
is that we've got some accounting tests in there that will only pass  
in 2009 so your only mistake was to be the first to commit something  
this year :-)

I won't have time to look at fixing the tests for a few days at least  
but if anyone else wants to jump on it that would be appreciated.

> Or does the blame list just look at the most recent commit even  
> though the test may have included various commits since the last test?

Correct, buildbot doesn't test every commit but instead just plays  
catchup by grabbing the latest revision if multiple commits have  
occurred during the previous build cycle.  I think the blamelist will  
include everyone who has committed something to the build being  
reported on.

>
> -David
>
>
> On Dec 31, 2009, at 6:39 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF  
>> Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2234
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>
>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>
>> Build Reason:
>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894956
>> Blamelist: jonesde
>>
>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>>
>> sincerely,
>> -The ASF Buildbot
>>
>

[Erwan de FERRIERES-3]

Hi all,


Le 01/01/2010 22:01, Scott Gray a écrit :
> On 1/01/2010, at 1:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there any way to get more details about this?
Yes, with looking at the JUnit HTML results, in
runtime/logs/test-results/html/

A CI server is displaying the results there :
http://selenium.neogia.org/junit/results/tests_2009.12.31_23:29:21/index.html

 From taking a quick look at the tests having the errors, we are using
2009 data, instead of 2010...

I'm going to correct them.

Cheers,

>

../..
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz

[Jacques Le Roux]

Thanks Erwan,

It's great to see united communities power in action

Jacques

From: "Erwan de FERRIERES" <[hidden email]>

> Hi all,
>
>
> Le 01/01/2010 22:01, Scott Gray a écrit :
>> On 1/01/2010, at 1:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is there any way to get more details about this?
> Yes, with looking at the JUnit HTML results, in runtime/logs/test-results/html/
>
> A CI server is displaying the results there : http://selenium.neogia.org/junit/results/tests_2009.12.31_23:29:21/index.html
>
> From taking a quick look at the tests having the errors, we are using 2009 data, instead of 2010...
>
> I'm going to correct them.
>
> Cheers,
>
>>
>
> ../..
> --
> Erwan de FERRIERES
> www.nereide.biz
>