calendar pop up broken?

[Chris Snow-3]

I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated
start date.

If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup
for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both represented as
yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss

Is this a bug?

Many thanks,

Chris

[Jacques Le Roux]

Try to update to at least r901197

Jacques

From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>

>I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated
> start date.
>
> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup
> for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both represented as
> yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Chris
>

[Chris Snow-3]

this was on demo.ofbiz.org

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Try to update to at least r901197
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>
>> I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated
>> start date.
>>
>> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup
>> for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both represented as
>> yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss
>>
>> Is this a bug?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>

[Chris Snow-3]

ah, that's at: 901102

Chris Snow wrote:

> this was on demo.ofbiz.org
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Try to update to at least r901197
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>
>>> I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an
>>> estimated start date.
>>>
>>> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar
>>> popup for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both represented
>>> as yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss
>>>
>>> Is this a bug?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

Chris,

To be clear I did not say it will fix it. I simply asked you to try.
Because I had to revert r900950 since it introduced a bad side effect for lookups by name (ordinary lookups seemed not to be
affected) and maybe this is also related. I'm still investigating the why, and also I can't easily test the AM-PM stuff since I'm on
a "French" machine (ok I could but I have enough things to do already ;o)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900950&view=rev

Please report in any cases. For the demo server we have to wait a day now...

Thanks for your help

Jacques

From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>

> ah, that's at: 901102
>
> Chris Snow wrote:
>> this was on demo.ofbiz.org
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Try to update to at least r901197
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>
>>>> I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated start date.
>>>>
>>>> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both
>>>> represented as yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss
>>>>
>>>> Is this a bug?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

It could be related somehow to the single digit month which seems to have shown up in the calendar since the start of this month (well that's when I noticed it).

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 20/01/2010, at 10:30 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Chris,
>
> To be clear I did not say it will fix it. I simply asked you to try.
> Because I had to revert r900950 since it introduced a bad side effect for lookups by name (ordinary lookups seemed not to be
> affected) and maybe this is also related. I'm still investigating the why, and also I can't easily test the AM-PM stuff since I'm on
> a "French" machine (ok I could but I have enough things to do already ;o)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900950&view=rev
>
> Please report in any cases. For the demo server we have to wait a day now...
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>
>> ah, that's at: 901102
>>
>> Chris Snow wrote:
>>> this was on demo.ofbiz.org
>>>
>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> Try to update to at least r901197
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated start date.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both
>>>>> represented as yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a bug?
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

[Chris Snow-3]

It appears to be broken on 901657.

Also, the svn revision number is not appearing in the html footer any more.

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Chris,
>
> To be clear I did not say it will fix it. I simply asked you to try.
> Because I had to revert r900950 since it introduced a bad side effect
> for lookups by name (ordinary lookups seemed not to be
> affected) and maybe this is also related. I'm still investigating the
> why, and also I can't easily test the AM-PM stuff since I'm on
> a "French" machine (ok I could but I have enough things to do already ;o)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900950&view=rev
>
> Please report in any cases. For the demo server we have to wait a day
> now...
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Jacques
>
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

The footer is ok on the demo server at Release-revision : trunk-901582.
To show it in your instance run "ant svninfo". BTW, at r901711, I have put a description about that in the coresponding target of
the main build.xml file. So now you can see it  using "ant -p".
For the AM-PM topic, hopefully someone will answer you...

Jacques

From: "Chris Snow" <[hidden email]>

> It appears to be broken on 901657.
>
> Also, the svn revision number is not appearing in the html footer any more.
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> To be clear I did not say it will fix it. I simply asked you to try.
>> Because I had to revert r900950 since it introduced a bad side effect for lookups by name (ordinary lookups seemed not to be
>> affected) and maybe this is also related. I'm still investigating the why, and also I can't easily test the AM-PM stuff since I'm
>> on
>> a "French" machine (ok I could but I have enough things to do already ;o)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900950&view=rev
>>
>> Please report in any cases. For the demo server we have to wait a day now...
>>
>> Thanks for your help
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

Hi Chris

I've fixed the month problem in r901992, could you update and check the work effort problem again and see if it's still there?

Thanks
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 20/01/2010, at 8:52 AM, Chris Snow wrote:

> I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated start date.
>
> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup for the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both represented as yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Chris