feedback requested - documenting ofbiz internals

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

feedback requested - documenting ofbiz internals

snowch
I'm trying to get a deep understanding of ofbiz internals.  I am
starting with documenting at a high level the startup sequence (see
http://docs.ofbiz.org/download/attachments/1218/Startup.png).  I still
have a lot of work todo such as class diagrams etc, but the process of
documenting is proving to be very useful to my understanding.  

Is this diagram (and others like it) useful to others?
Is there any work done on this already?
My UML is not great am I on track with what I've done so far?

Many thanks in advance,

Chris

P.s. is it acceptable to cross post messages like this if they apply to
both lists?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: feedback requested - documenting ofbiz internals

Torsten Schlabach-2
Hi Chris!

Documentation always makes sense, and I personally wish I had more time
for stuff like this. Just make sure you make your results available in
the right place. I understand, this is going to be the Wiki.

There has been a discussion about documentation some time ago. The
subject line was "Properly edited OFBiz manuals". It might be worth
reading through that thread as I think this will be the feedback you're
asking for.

Regards,
Torsten

Christopher Snow schrieb:

> I'm trying to get a deep understanding of ofbiz internals.  I am
> starting with documenting at a high level the startup sequence (see
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/download/attachments/1218/Startup.png).  I still
> have a lot of work todo such as class diagrams etc, but the process of
> documenting is proving to be very useful to my understanding.  
>
> Is this diagram (and others like it) useful to others?
> Is there any work done on this already?
> My UML is not great am I on track with what I've done so far?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Chris
>
> P.s. is it acceptable to cross post messages like this if they apply to
> both lists?