jetty component

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

jetty component

Erwan de FERRIERES-3
Hi all,

while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty
server. As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?

Also, is there someone using it or not ?

Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jetty component

J. Eckard-2
Yes, I use it. I believe the only thing missing from the implementation in
the official codebase is persistent session support, which could be added.

Why remove it? If nothing else, it would nice to be able to run performance
tests against the two if you suspect that one (or ofbiz's interaction with
one) is underperforming.


On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty server.
> As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?
>
> Also, is there someone using it or not ?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Erwan de FERRIERES
> www.nereide.biz
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jetty component

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Erwan de FERRIERES-3
The idea is that some outside there may use it, so we keep it
We can't be sure that those persons are reading the dev ML, but they may still rely on Jetty

Jacques

From: "Erwan de FERRIERES" <[hidden email]>

> Hi all,
>
> while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty
> server. As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?
>
> Also, is there someone using it or not ?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Erwan de FERRIERES
> www.nereide.biz
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jetty component

Erwan de FERRIERES
In reply to this post by J. Eckard-2
Le 28/06/2010 17:35, Joe Eckard a écrit :

> Yes, I use it. I believe the only thing missing from the implementation in
> the official codebase is persistent session support, which could be added.
>
> Why remove it? If nothing else, it would nice to be able to run performance
> tests against the two if you suspect that one (or ofbiz's interaction with
> one) is underperforming.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES<
> [hidden email]>  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> while taking a look at the framework component, I found the jetty server.
>> As it is always commented, what is the point in keeping it ?
>>
>> Also, is there someone using it or not ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Erwan de FERRIERES
>> www.nereide.biz
>>
>
Yeah I was a bit harsh on this one... sorry for that. Anyway, as you
said, performance tests would be useful, "just to know".
Also, are you still using the embedded jetty 6, or have you migrated to
the 7 ? this would be a great addition :)

Cheers,

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz