I wouldn't have any objections.
Regards Scott On 07/08/07, Shi Yusen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Could it be released now? > > Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. > > > |
Administrator
|
I would follow Scott opinion as I believe he is the most aware of the release status.
Jacques De : "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> > I wouldn't have any objections. > > Regards > Scott > > On 07/08/07, Shi Yusen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Could it be released now? > > > > Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. > > > > > > > |
Hi Jacques
That's not entirely true, while I did commit a lot of fixes I'm not actually making heavy use of the release branch. It would be good to hear from people who are making use of the branch. Regards Scott On 07/08/07, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I would follow Scott opinion as I believe he is the most aware of the > release status. > > Jacques > > De : "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> > > I wouldn't have any objections. > > > > Regards > > Scott > > > > On 07/08/07, Shi Yusen <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > Could it be released now? > > > > > > Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. > > > > > > > > > > > > |
We are past the 3 month time frame that was initially hoped for as sufficient to stabilize a release branch. We could do a release any time, but until some thorough testing and review is done I don't know if that really makes sense. We still want to get people involved in the branch as opposed to just downloading and using the binary release. To take the next step I agree with Scott, we need to hear from those who are using the release branch in any way, preferably as a basis for real world solutions. So, here is a request to the community: if you are using the release4.0 branch, please write to us and share your experiences and thoughts on the stability of the branch. If you aren't comfortable sending this to the public mailing lists, feel free to send it to [hidden email] and that will only go to the Project Management Committee. I think at this point what we do with this is pretty simple. If we hear from people with generally positive feedback we'll do a binary release and hopefully attract more users to it by doing so. If not, we'll wait a bit longer until more of us have a desire to invest in it. Thanks! -David Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Jacques > > That's not entirely true, while I did commit a lot of fixes I'm not actually > making heavy use of the release branch. It would be good to hear from > people who are making use of the branch. > > Regards > Scott > > On 07/08/07, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I would follow Scott opinion as I believe he is the most aware of the >> release status. >> >> Jacques >> >> De : "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >>> I wouldn't have any objections. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 07/08/07, Shi Yusen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Could it be released now? >>>> >>>> Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. >>>> >>>> >>>> > |
I have incorporated 4.0 in to a real world, but not all the activities
are being tested since we don't use the Ecommerce as it was released. I think it is important that anyone reporting state what modules they are using and if they have modified them. user testing will start soon David E Jones sent the following on 8/7/2007 4:27 AM: > > We are past the 3 month time frame that was initially hoped for as > sufficient to stabilize a release branch. We could do a release any > time, but until some thorough testing and review is done I don't know if > that really makes sense. We still want to get people involved in the > branch as opposed to just downloading and using the binary release. > > To take the next step I agree with Scott, we need to hear from those who > are using the release branch in any way, preferably as a basis for real > world solutions. > > So, here is a request to the community: if you are using the release4.0 > branch, please write to us and share your experiences and thoughts on > the stability of the branch. > > If you aren't comfortable sending this to the public mailing lists, feel > free to send it to [hidden email] and that will only go to the > Project Management Committee. > > I think at this point what we do with this is pretty simple. If we hear > from people with generally positive feedback we'll do a binary release > and hopefully attract more users to it by doing so. If not, we'll wait a > bit longer until more of us have a desire to invest in it. > > Thanks! > -David > > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Hi Jacques >> >> That's not entirely true, while I did commit a lot of fixes I'm not >> actually >> making heavy use of the release branch. It would be good to hear from >> people who are making use of the branch. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 07/08/07, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> I would follow Scott opinion as I believe he is the most aware of the >>> release status. >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> De : "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> >>>> I wouldn't have any objections. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 07/08/07, Shi Yusen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> Could it be released now? >>>>> >>>>> Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> > > > |
Congratulations, we go a task force to tests.
2007/8/7, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]>: > > I have incorporated 4.0 in to a real world, but not all the activities > are being tested since we don't use the Ecommerce as it was released. > I think it is important that anyone reporting state what modules they > are using and if they have modified them. > > user testing will start soon > > David E Jones sent the following on 8/7/2007 4:27 AM: > > > > We are past the 3 month time frame that was initially hoped for as > > sufficient to stabilize a release branch. We could do a release any > > time, but until some thorough testing and review is done I don't know if > > that really makes sense. We still want to get people involved in the > > branch as opposed to just downloading and using the binary release. > > > > To take the next step I agree with Scott, we need to hear from those who > > are using the release branch in any way, preferably as a basis for real > > world solutions. > > > > So, here is a request to the community: if you are using the release4.0 > > branch, please write to us and share your experiences and thoughts on > > the stability of the branch. > > > > If you aren't comfortable sending this to the public mailing lists, feel > > free to send it to [hidden email] and that will only go to the > > Project Management Committee. > > > > I think at this point what we do with this is pretty simple. If we hear > > from people with generally positive feedback we'll do a binary release > > and hopefully attract more users to it by doing so. If not, we'll wait a > > bit longer until more of us have a desire to invest in it. > > > > Thanks! > > -David > > > > > > Scott Gray wrote: > >> Hi Jacques > >> > >> That's not entirely true, while I did commit a lot of fixes I'm not > >> actually > >> making heavy use of the release branch. It would be good to hear from > >> people who are making use of the branch. > >> > >> Regards > >> Scott > >> > >> On 07/08/07, Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> I would follow Scott opinion as I believe he is the most aware of the > >>> release status. > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> De : "Scott Gray" <[hidden email]> > >>>> I wouldn't have any objections. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Scott > >>>> > >>>> On 07/08/07, Shi Yusen <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>>> Could it be released now? > >>>>> > >>>>> Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Nicolas Malin (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1170. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Release Branch 4.0 SVN trunk I applied the NewFreeMarkerWorker.patch. I tested it one week without any problems. It's commited as CTR in trunk 564530 and release4.0 564531 > FreeMarkerWorker class has a bug in its caching logic > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-1170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1170 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 > Reporter: Adrian Crum > Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk, Release Branch 4.0 > > Attachments: FreeMarkerWorker.patch, FreeMarkerWorker.patch, FreeMarkerWorker.patch, FreeMarkerWorker.patch, FreeMarkerWorker.patch, FreeMarkerWorker.patch, NewFreeMarkerWorker.patch, NewFreeMarkerWorker.patch, NewFreeMarkerWorker.patch > > > The FreeMarkerWorker class creates an instance of the Template class, initializes it with the current user's locale, then stores it in a cache. Other users will see the template rendered in the first user's locale, regardless of their locale setting. > This can be demonstrated on the Hot Wax demo site in the WorkEffort calendar. Some elements in the screen are rendered in another locale, regardless of your current locale setting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |