[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878691#action_12878691 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3703:
----------------------------------------
There was a bug in this: it did not take into account the specific case of extension. I have fixed it at r954583
This bug was in updatePartyContactMech. When you wanted to update only the extension of a phone number it did not get stored. I said "that seems to have been introduced" because it's working in stable demo without changes, so I guess it's related to the change in this issue
I also remove a useless couple of lines at the beginning of the updatePartyContactMech service.
Finally I must say that I find very weird to have extension in PartyContactMech entity. It would be certainly more logical to have in TelecomNumber. Is it really used for anything else than phone number extension?
> updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3703
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Arun Patidar
> Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch, OFBIZ-3703.patch
>
>
> updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new record when contactMechId is unchange.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Locked
