jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacopo Cappellato-4
Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?

Jacopo

ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking for us)
in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.

So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)

I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)


Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)

And... I'm tired... :/

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>

> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>
> Jacopo
>
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Hans,

Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
feature to continue to work?

Jacopo:
jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough: http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html
jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)

But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

>I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking for us)
>in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>
> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>
> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>
>
> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>
> And... I'm tired... :/
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Bump...!

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

> Hans,
>
> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
> feature to continue to work?
>
> Jacopo:
> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough: http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html
> jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
>
> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking for
>>us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>
>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>>
>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>>
>>
>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>>
>> And... I'm tired... :/
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>

> Bump...!
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> Hans,
>>
>> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
>> feature to continue to work?
>>
>> Jacopo:
>> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
>> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough: http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html
>> jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
>>
>> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking for
>>>us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>
>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>>>
>>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>>>
>>>
>>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>>>
>>> And... I'm tired... :/
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

hans_bakker
The author is willing to change the license, allow some time here.....

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> > Bump...!
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
> >> feature to continue to work?
> >>
> >> Jacopo:
> >> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
> >> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough: http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html
> >> jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
> >>
> >> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> >>>I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking for
> >>>us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
> >>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
> >>>
> >>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
> >>>
> >>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
> >>>
> >>> And... I'm tired... :/
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
> >>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacopo
> >>>>
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Great, thanks Hans

Jacques

From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]>

> The author is willing to change the license, allow some time here.....
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> > Bump...!
>> >
>> > Jacques
>> >
>> > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> >> Hans,
>> >>
>> >> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
>> >> feature to continue to work?
>> >>
>> >> Jacopo:
>> >> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
>> >> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough:
>> >> http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html
>> >> jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
>> >>
>> >> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
>> >>
>> >> Jacques
>> >>
>> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>> >>>I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>> >>>for
>> >>>us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>> >>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>> >>>
>> >>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>> >>>
>> >>> And... I'm tired... :/
>> >>>
>> >>> Jacques
>> >>>
>> >>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>> >>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Jacopo
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

hans_bakker
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jaques,

although not shown in the js file (the author will update it)

the license is MIT:

http://code.google.com/p/jqueryrotate/

Regards,
Hans

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> > Bump...!
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
> >> feature to continue to work?
> >>
> >> Jacopo:
> >> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
> >> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough: http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html
> >> jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
> >>
> >> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
> >>>I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking for
> >>>us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
> >>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
> >>>
> >>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
> >>>
> >>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
> >>>
> >>> And... I'm tired... :/
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
> >>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacopo
> >>>>
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
> >>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
OK, cool dual licensing as most jQuery plugins, thanks Hans, I will update LICENCE and it's done
I think the author should make it clear because it's still not obvious if you get to http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ or is
it a wrong url (not the same plugin?)

I have still a pure OFBiz concern tough:
>>>>> I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>>>>> for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement

Why not using the one in Framework?

Jacques

Hans Bakker wrote:

> Hi Jaques,
>
> although not shown in the js file (the author will update it)
>
> the license is MIT:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/jqueryrotate/
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>> Bump...!
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>> Hans,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
>>>> feature to continue to work?
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo:
>>>> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
>>>> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough:
>>>> http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
>>>>
>>>> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>>>>> for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>>>>>
>>>>> And... I'm tired... :/
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
And also why not using the standard jQuery structure with plugins in Framework?

Thanks

Jacques

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> I have still a pure OFBiz concern tough:
>>>>>> I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>>>>>> for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement
>
> Why not using the one in Framework?
>
> Jacques
>
> Hans Bakker wrote:
>> Hi Jaques,
>>
>> although not shown in the js file (the author will update it)
>>
>> the license is MIT:
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/jqueryrotate/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hans
>>
>> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>> Bump...!
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets the
>>>>> feature to continue to work?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo:
>>>>> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
>>>>> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough:
>>>>> http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
>>>>>
>>>>> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>>>>>> for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And... I'm tired... :/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: jquery files not mentioned in the LICENSE file

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
Easier for us to update (nothing to do) in LICENCE

ofbiz/trunk/framework/images/webapp/images/jquery/*

et voilĂ !

Thanks

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> And also why not using the standard jQuery structure with plugins in Framework?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> I have still a pure OFBiz concern tough:
>>>>>>> I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>>>>>>> for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement
>>
>> Why not using the one in Framework?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Hans Bakker wrote:
>>> Hi Jaques,
>>>
>>> although not shown in the js file (the author will update it)
>>>
>>> the license is MIT:
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/jqueryrotate/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hans
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care of the GPL issues...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>> Bump...!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> Hans,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please check that removing ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js lets
>>>>>> the feature to continue to work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacopo:
>>>>>> jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a simple note in NOTICE is enough
>>>>>> jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in NOTICE is enough:
>>>>>> http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html jquery.function.js should be licensed by us (it's obviously a covert)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
>>>>>>> for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js is v1.3.2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so far (have all centralized in framework/images)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I get a blank screen)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And... I'm tired... :/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
>>>>>>>> ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js