Administrator
|
I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at least :
User-agents: * This may facilitate futur ease of this file. Is it worth to do so ? Jacques |
Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs (Search-engine-friendly URLs).
Jonathon Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at least : > > User-agents: * > > This may facilitate futur ease of this file. > > Is it worth to do so ? > > Jacques > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: 2/2/2007 11:39 PM |
Administrator
|
Jonathon,
No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ? Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM Subject: Re: robots.txt > Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs (Search-engine-friendly URLs). > > Jonathon > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at least : > > > > User-agents: * > > > > This may facilitate futur ease of this file. > > > > Is it worth to do so ? > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: 2/2/2007 11:39 PM |
Actually, OFBiz _does_ have support and use in various areas for search engine friendly URLs. Here is an example: http://demo.dejc.com:8080/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=100 All of the product links on that page are also search engine friendly and just look like directories. And yes, the "~" and "=" characters are valid. -David On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Jonathon, > > No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ? > > Jacques > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM > Subject: Re: robots.txt > > >> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs (Search-engine- >> friendly URLs). >> >> Jonathon >> >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at >>> least : >>> >>> User-agents: * >>> >>> This may facilitate futur ease of this file. >>> >>> Is it worth to do so ? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ---- >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: >>> 2/2/2007 11:39 PM smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment |
Jacques,
Well, +1 for the robots.txt file then. :) No, I didn't read your post on "URL rewriting", sorry. What's the master plan? Any conventions drawn up? What's the subject title of the post? Jonathon David E. Jones wrote: > > Actually, OFBiz _does_ have support and use in various areas for search > engine friendly URLs. > > Here is an example: > > http://demo.dejc.com:8080/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=100 > > All of the product links on that page are also search engine friendly > and just look like directories. And yes, the "~" and "=" characters are > valid. > > -David > > > On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Jonathon, >> >> No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ? >> >> Jacques >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]> >> To: <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM >> Subject: Re: robots.txt >> >> >>> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs >>> (Search-engine-friendly URLs). >>> >>> Jonathon >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at >>>> least : >>>> >>>> User-agents: * >>>> >>>> This may facilitate futur ease of this file. >>>> >>>> Is it worth to do so ? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: >>>> 2/2/2007 11:39 PM > |
Administrator
|
Jonathon,
Actually I have no master plan yet. Just a need and now a question from Cedric ;o). The thread is here : http://www.nabble.com/URL-REwriting-tf3173338.html#a8803357 Jacques > Jacques, > > Well, +1 for the robots.txt file then. :) > > No, I didn't read your post on "URL rewriting", sorry. What's the master plan? Any conventions > drawn up? What's the subject title of the post? > > Jonathon > > David E. Jones wrote: > > > > Actually, OFBiz _does_ have support and use in various areas for search > > engine friendly URLs. > > > > Here is an example: > > > > http://demo.dejc.com:8080/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=100 > > > > All of the product links on that page are also search engine friendly > > and just look like directories. And yes, the "~" and "=" characters are > > valid. > > > > -David > > > > > > On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > >> Jonathon, > >> > >> No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ? > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]> > >> To: <[hidden email]> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM > >> Subject: Re: robots.txt > >> > >> > >>> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs > >>> (Search-engine-friendly URLs). > >>> > >>> Jonathon > >>> > >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at > >>>> least : > >>>> > >>>> User-agents: * > >>>> > >>>> This may facilitate futur ease of this file. > >>>> > >>>> Is it worth to do so ? > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. > >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >>>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: > >>>> 2/2/2007 11:39 PM > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |