robots.txt

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

robots.txt

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at least :

User-agents: *

This may facilitate futur ease of this file.

Is it worth to do so ?

Jacques
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robots.txt

jonwimp
Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs (Search-engine-friendly URLs).

Jonathon

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at least :
>
> User-agents: *
>
> This may facilitate futur ease of this file.
>
> Is it worth to do so ?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: 2/2/2007 11:39 PM

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robots.txt

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Jonathon,

No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ?

Jacques

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: robots.txt


> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs (Search-engine-friendly URLs).
>
> Jonathon
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> > I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at least :
> >
> > User-agents: *
> >
> > This may facilitate futur ease of this file.
> >
> > Is it worth to do so ?
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: 2/2/2007 11:39 PM
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robots.txt

David E Jones

Actually, OFBiz _does_ have support and use in various areas for  
search engine friendly URLs.

Here is an example:

http://demo.dejc.com:8080/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=100

All of the product links on that page are also search engine friendly  
and just look like directories. And yes, the "~" and "=" characters  
are valid.

-David


On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> Jonathon,
>
> No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ?
>
> Jacques
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM
> Subject: Re: robots.txt
>
>
>> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs (Search-engine-
>> friendly URLs).
>>
>> Jonathon
>>
>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at  
>>> least :
>>>
>>> User-agents: *
>>>
>>> This may facilitate futur ease of this file.
>>>
>>> Is it worth to do so ?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date:  
>>> 2/2/2007 11:39 PM


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robots.txt

jonwimp
Jacques,

Well, +1 for the robots.txt file then. :)

No, I didn't read your post on "URL rewriting", sorry. What's the master plan? Any conventions
drawn up? What's the subject title of the post?

Jonathon

David E. Jones wrote:

>
> Actually, OFBiz _does_ have support and use in various areas for search
> engine friendly URLs.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> http://demo.dejc.com:8080/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=100
>
> All of the product links on that page are also search engine friendly
> and just look like directories. And yes, the "~" and "=" characters are
> valid.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Jonathon,
>>
>> No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]>
>> To: <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: robots.txt
>>
>>
>>> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs
>>> (Search-engine-friendly URLs).
>>>
>>> Jonathon
>>>
>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at
>>>> least :
>>>>
>>>> User-agents: *
>>>>
>>>> This may facilitate futur ease of this file.
>>>>
>>>> Is it worth to do so ?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date:
>>>> 2/2/2007 11:39 PM
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: robots.txt

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Jonathon,

Actually I have no master plan yet. Just a need and now a question from Cedric ;o).
The thread is here : http://www.nabble.com/URL-REwriting-tf3173338.html#a8803357

Jacques


> Jacques,
>
> Well, +1 for the robots.txt file then. :)
>
> No, I didn't read your post on "URL rewriting", sorry. What's the master plan? Any conventions
> drawn up? What's the subject title of the post?
>
> Jonathon
>
> David E. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Actually, OFBiz _does_ have support and use in various areas for search
> > engine friendly URLs.
> >
> > Here is an example:
> >
> > http://demo.dejc.com:8080/ecommerce/control/category/~category_id=100
> >
> > All of the product links on that page are also search engine friendly
> > and just look like directories. And yes, the "~" and "=" characters are
> > valid.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >
> >> Jonathon,
> >>
> >> No OFBiz don't. Did you seen my message about "URL REwriting" ?
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jonathon -- Improov" <[hidden email]>
> >> To: <[hidden email]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:34 AM
> >> Subject: Re: robots.txt
> >>
> >>
> >>> Well, sure. But I didn't know OFBiz had clean URLs
> >>> (Search-engine-friendly URLs).
> >>>
> >>> Jonathon
> >>>
> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>>> I propose to add a mininal robots.txt file in root containing at
> >>>> least :
> >>>>
> >>>> User-agents: *
> >>>>
> >>>> This may facilitate futur ease of this file.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is it worth to do so ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date:
> >>>> 2/2/2007 11:39 PM
> >