what drew me to ofbiz is:
1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so portable. 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script 4)ui tied to the entities 5)using xsd to define the widgets however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my dues for the core code I am using. I wish you well. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man |
Good luck BJ.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:51 AM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote: > what drew me to ofbiz is: > 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so > portable. > 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script > 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script > 4)ui tied to the entities > 5)using xsd to define the widgets > > however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am > re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. > I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. > so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can > contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. > > we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into > machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow > developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. > > ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my > dues for the core code I am using. > > > I wish you well. > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Hopefully you will come from time to time
Good luck BJ Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[hidden email]> > what drew me to ofbiz is: > 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so > portable. > 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script > 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script > 4)ui tied to the entities > 5)using xsd to define the widgets > > however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am > re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. > I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. > so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can > contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. > > we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into > machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow > developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. > > ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my > dues for the core code I am using. > > > I wish you well. > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
BJ
Hate to see you moving on. You are always entertaining and helpful. Good Luck Skip -----Original Message----- From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:52 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: well it is time what drew me to ofbiz is: 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so portable. 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script 4)ui tied to the entities 5)using xsd to define the widgets however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my dues for the core code I am using. I wish you well. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Hi BJ,
not sure if this is good for you or your customers or OFBiz? Why? 1. maintain an ERP system on your own? 3. How about your customers? ERP system supported by a single operation? 4. OFBiz looses one of its most active supporters? 5. No contribution? I am sure people in the ofbiz community will be interested in this compiler? I think you should reconsider..... Regards, Hans On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 05:51 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote: > what drew me to ofbiz is: > 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so > portable. > 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script > 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script > 4)ui tied to the entities > 5)using xsd to define the widgets > > however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am > re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. > I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. > so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can > contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. > > we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into > machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow > developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. > > ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my > dues for the core code I am using. > > > I wish you well. > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. |
thank for the replies.
1) From my perspective this is not an ERP,but a core that has layered applications for 52(so far) different markets. This is not on my own, have a group from local colleges, I have been training my way. However those with an ofbiz back ground, and a NDA will be ask to work on section, for pay, as the resources are needed. 3)hope and aspiration of being a large corporation. done it before, so confident can do it again. As David Said, my contribution are flawed. and it really is like going up hill when all I wanted was to share so everyone could benefit. On top of that I am use to a environment where everything is tested before submitted, which as many have said, they, as volunteers, do not see a reason to have project management. 5) when it comes down to linking the assemblers, anyone contributing on for a new cpu not in the library will be given an non exclusive license for that CPU. the proof of tests suite, of course. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Hans Bakker sent the following on 3/1/2011 6:01 PM: > Hi BJ, > > not sure if this is good for you or your customers or OFBiz? > Why? > 1. maintain an ERP system on your own? > 3. How about your customers? ERP system supported by a single operation? > 4. OFBiz looses one of its most active supporters? > 5. No contribution? I am sure people in the ofbiz community will be > interested in this compiler? > > I think you should reconsider..... > > Regards, > Hans > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 05:51 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote: >> what drew me to ofbiz is: >> 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so >> portable. >> 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script >> 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script >> 4)ui tied to the entities >> 5)using xsd to define the widgets >> >> however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am >> re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. >> I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. >> so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can >> contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. >> >> we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into >> machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow >> developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. >> >> ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my >> dues for the core code I am using. >> >> >> I wish you well. >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> > |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Good luck - and like we say here in Africa - "Hamba Khahle" - Go well.
-----Original Message----- From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 01 March 2011 03:52 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: well it is time what drew me to ofbiz is: 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so portable. 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script 4)ui tied to the entities 5)using xsd to define the widgets however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my dues for the core code I am using. I wish you well. ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man |
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Good luck BJ. Hope to see you around again.
Bilgin On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:51 PM, BJ Freeman <[hidden email]> wrote: > what drew me to ofbiz is: > 1)entity engine without a specific DB. the entity defines the db. so > portable. > 2)entity engine using xsd to define the simple-methods script > 3)service engine using xsd to define the service script > 4)ui tied to the entities > 5)using xsd to define the widgets > > however the code I now have has re-factored Entities and I am > re-factoring as much of the java classes into the simple-methods. > I have re-factored most all bsh/groovy, to be defined in widgets. > so what I have, can not take advantage of the SVN and conversely I can > contribute from my code to the svn, so not sure how I can be of assistance. > > we have started an initiative to provide a compiler to turn code into > machine. the allows productions to run mean and lean but allow > developers to do thier coding and testing using the runtime vm. > > ofbiz now has many people to support it so I feel that I have paid my > dues for the core code I am using. > > > I wish you well. > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < > http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |