[OFBiz] Users - Requirement linking stuff

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[OFBiz] Users - Requirement linking stuff

Ashish Hareet
Si,

For "createRequirementFromItemATP" I think I'm still confused with the requirements
& all the calculaions that go into it, so I'll leave that for now...

As for associating auto requirements with facility, given your scenario, I'll
agree with you, but I think there should be an option to assoc it
to a default facility if desired.

In my case we have one facility & for user configurable products, they
have auto create requiremet set & it'd be good if it had the
facility set automatically.

One more question. When I look at requirements, I can't tell
why the requirement was generated.
        *To bring back inventory to the min stock level
        *To fullfill an order
        *To bring back ATP to min stock level, etc, etc

How can I know the above ?

If we can't tell why a requirement was generated looking at
the requirements(currently), I think we need to put some effort towards
getting such a feature...

Feedback appreciated
Ashish Hareet
http://www.cpbinc.com



-----Original Message-----
Ashish,

"createRequirementFromItemATP" should.  I wrote it, and I thought it did...

As to associating with a facility... Pardon me for asking this, but if
the requirement is an automatic requirement every time an order is
created, why should it be linked to a facility?  If you had multiple
facilities, how would you know which facility it should be assigned to,
if all you have is an order?

Si

Ashish Hareet wrote:
 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [OFBiz] Users - Requirement linking stuff

Si Chen-2
Ashish -

How would you define the default facility?  Through the product store?

How about using Requirement.requirementTypeId and just adding a few more
types?  Maybe we should see what Jacopo thinks of it.

Si

Ashish Hareet wrote:

>Si,
>
>For "createRequirementFromItemATP" I think I'm still confused with the requirements
>& all the calculaions that go into it, so I'll leave that for now...
>
>As for associating auto requirements with facility, given your scenario, I'll
>agree with you, but I think there should be an option to assoc it
>to a default facility if desired.
>
>In my case we have one facility & for user configurable products, they
>have auto create requiremet set & it'd be good if it had the
>facility set automatically.
>
>One more question. When I look at requirements, I can't tell
>why the requirement was generated.
> *To bring back inventory to the min stock level
> *To fullfill an order
> *To bring back ATP to min stock level, etc, etc
>
>How can I know the above ?
>
>If we can't tell why a requirement was generated looking at
>the requirements(currently), I think we need to put some effort towards
>getting such a feature...
>
>Feedback appreciated
>Ashish Hareet
>http://www.cpbinc.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Ashish,
>
>"createRequirementFromItemATP" should.  I wrote it, and I thought it did...
>
>As to associating with a facility... Pardon me for asking this, but if
>the requirement is an automatic requirement every time an order is
>created, why should it be linked to a facility?  If you had multiple
>facilities, how would you know which facility it should be assigned to,
>if all you have is an order?
>
>Si
>
>Ashish Hareet wrote:
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>[hidden email]
>http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>  
>
 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/users