[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Jacopo Cappellato-3
 This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the
"release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will
supersede all the previous releases from the same branch.

The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
* apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip
* KEYS: text file with keys
* apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file
* apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file

Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions
on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html).

Vote:
[ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04
[ -1] do not release

This vote will be open for 5 days.

For more details about this process please read
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Michael Brohl-3
-1

Hi Jacopo,

we should first fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11848
which I had to reopen because of missing configuration which leads to
not working AJP connections.

I'll provide a fix soon.

Best regards,

Michael Brohl

ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de


Am 03.07.20 um 16:23 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:

>   This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the
> "release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will
> supersede all the previous releases from the same branch.
>
> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
> and are:
> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip
> * KEYS: text file with keys
> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file
> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file
>
> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions
> on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html).
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04
> [ -1] do not release
>
> This vote will be open for 5 days.
>
> For more details about this process please read
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Michael Brohl-3
The fix is committed, please check.

Thanks,

Michael Brohl

ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de


Am 03.07.20 um 17:10 schrieb Michael Brohl:

> -1
>
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> we should first fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11848
> which I had to reopen because of missing configuration which leads to
> not working AJP connections.
>
> I'll provide a fix soon.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 03.07.20 um 16:23 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>>   This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the
>> "release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will
>> supersede all the previous releases from the same branch.
>>
>> The release files can be downloaded from here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
>> and are:
>> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip
>> * KEYS: text file with keys
>> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file
>> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file
>>
>> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for
>> instructions
>> on testing the signatures see
>> http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html).
>>
>> Vote:
>> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04
>> [ -1] do not release
>>
>> This vote will be open for 5 days.
>>
>> For more details about this process please read
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>
>


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-3
-1 for now.

check OK:

$ ./verify-ofbiz-release.sh apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip
sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip
Using sha file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512
apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip: 74F79D42 2746A409 9C0F2E0D 5F96C070 78C73D7B 4C681452 EB974F18 33E2E391 3E1C7D1F 2F0E8A44 C18AC8FF A9F86094 4C9F5D4D
5DDA3AB9 E2DC2057 CA0F2E33
apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip: 74F79D42 2746A409 9C0F2E0D 5F96C070 78C73D7B 4C681452 EB974F18 33E2E391 3E1C7D1F 2F0E8A44 C18AC8FF A9F86094 4C9F5D4D
5DDA3AB9 E2DC2057 CA0F2E33
sha checksum OK

GPG verification output
gpg: Signature made Fri Jul  3 16:04:40 2020
gpg:                using RSA key 7A580908847AF9E0
gpg: Good signature from "Jacopo Cappellato (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[hidden email]>"


Running OFBiz (gradlew loadAll ofbiz) is OK but I initially get:

2020-07-03 16:56:13,607 |catalina-startup-6 |CatalinaContainer             |I|
host[StandardEngine[default-server].StandardHost[0.0.0.0]].addChild(StandardEngine[default-server].StandardHost[0.0.0.0].Standa
rdContext[/ecommerce])
Jul 03, 2020 4:56:13 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester error
SEVERE: Parse error at line [20] column [24]
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId:
file:///C:/projectsASF/Git/ofbiz-framework/tools/apache-ofbiz-17.12.04/applications/commonext/webapp/ordermgr-js/WEB-INF/web.xml; lineNumber: 20;
columnNumber: 24; cvc
-elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 'web-app'.
         at org.apache.xerces.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(Unknown Source)

I think we should mention that this is not a real issue referring to the corresponding Jiras. The same reappears when running testIntegration.


I see another issue locally, that exists also on R17 demo:

2020-07-03 03:10:02,911 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil                  |E| Column [ACCOMMODATION_CLASS_ID] of table [OFBIZ.ACCOMMODATION_CLASS] of
entity [AccommodationClass] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs
to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an
null values.
[...]
2020-07-03 03:10:03,092 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil                  |E| Column [CITY] of table [OFBIZ.ZIP_SALES_TAX_LOOKUP] of entity
[ZipSalesTaxLookup] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs to be
re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null
values.

This does not exist in trunk, did not check R18.

Weirdly it does not exist in Buildbot either for R17. Even before Michael's last fix for AJP. Anyway I don't use AJP locally nor does Buildbot.

And finally it does not prevent the tests to pass.

I'm not sure what this is or if  it's random. But it would certainly not look good to users's views. We need to understand what's the problem is.

I also found a bug in scrum/template/AcceptedBacklogNotification.ftl but that can wait.

Jacques

Le 03/07/2020 à 16:23, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :

>   This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the
> "release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will
> supersede all the previous releases from the same branch.
>
> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
> and are:
> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip
> * KEYS: text file with keys
> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file
> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file
>
> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions
> on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html).
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04
> [ -1] do not release
>
> This vote will be open for 5 days.
>
> For more details about this process please read
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> I think we should mention that this is not a real issue referring to the corresponding Jiras.
Forgot to mention it's OFBIZ-6807  and related

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
Le 03/07/2020 à 19:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> I think we should mention that this is not a real issue referring to the corresponding Jiras.
> Forgot to mention it's OFBIZ-6807  and related
I just fixed a miss in OFBIZ-6993, should not be a worry anymore

Jacques

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Jacques Le Roux
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :

> I see another issue locally, that exists also on R17 demo:
>
> 2020-07-03 03:10:02,911 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil                  |E| Column [ACCOMMODATION_CLASS_ID] of table [OFBIZ.ACCOMMODATION_CLASS] of
> entity [AccommodationClass] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table
> needs to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot
> have an null values.
> [...]
> 2020-07-03 03:10:03,092 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil                  |E| Column [CITY] of table [OFBIZ.ZIP_SALES_TAX_LOOKUP] of entity
> [ZipSalesTaxLookup] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs to be
> re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null
> values.
>
> This does not exist in trunk, did not check R18.
>
> Weirdly it does not exist in Buildbot either for R17. Even before Michael's last fix for AJP. Anyway I don't use AJP locally nor does Buildbot.
>
> And finally it does not prevent the tests to pass.

This is no longer a problem. I fixed it in OFBIZ-11312. I wrongly removed a line when backporting by hand in R17

I see now no reasons to create a new "Tentative release files for Apache OFBiz 17.12.04"

Thanks

Jacques
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 17.12.04

Jacopo Cappellato-3
Thank you Michael and Jacques for your feedback and fixes.
This vote is cancelled, I am going to prepare new release files and start a
new vote thread.

Jacopo


On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 11:56 AM Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > I see another issue locally, that exists also on R17 demo:
> >
> > 2020-07-03 03:10:02,911 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil
> |E| Column [ACCOMMODATION_CLASS_ID] of table [OFBIZ.ACCOMMODATION_CLASS] of
> > entity [AccommodationClass] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS
> a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table
> > needs to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary
> key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column
> cannot
> > have an null values.
> > [...]
> > 2020-07-03 03:10:03,092 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil
> |E| Column [CITY] of table [OFBIZ.ZIP_SALES_TAX_LOOKUP] of entity
> > [ZipSalesTaxLookup] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a
> primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs
> to be
> > re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that
> data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null
> > values.
> >
> > This does not exist in trunk, did not check R18.
> >
> > Weirdly it does not exist in Buildbot either for R17. Even before
> Michael's last fix for AJP. Anyway I don't use AJP locally nor does
> Buildbot.
> >
> > And finally it does not prevent the tests to pass.
>
> This is no longer a problem. I fixed it in OFBIZ-11312. I wrongly removed
> a line when backporting by hand in R17
>
> I see now no reasons to create a new "Tentative release files for Apache
> OFBiz 17.12.04"
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>