This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the
"release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip * KEYS: text file with keys * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). Vote: [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04 [ -1] do not release This vote will be open for 5 days. For more details about this process please read http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html |
-1
Hi Jacopo, we should first fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11848 which I had to reopen because of missing configuration which leads to not working AJP connections. I'll provide a fix soon. Best regards, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 03.07.20 um 16:23 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the > "release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > and are: > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > > Vote: > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment |
The fix is committed, please check.
Thanks, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 03.07.20 um 17:10 schrieb Michael Brohl: > -1 > > Hi Jacopo, > > we should first fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11848 > which I had to reopen because of missing configuration which leads to > not working AJP connections. > > I'll provide a fix soon. > > Best regards, > > Michael Brohl > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > Am 03.07.20 um 16:23 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: >> This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the >> "release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will >> supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. >> >> The release files can be downloaded from here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ >> and are: >> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip >> * KEYS: text file with keys >> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file >> * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file >> >> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for >> instructions >> on testing the signatures see >> http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). >> >> Vote: >> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04 >> [ -1] do not release >> >> This vote will be open for 5 days. >> >> For more details about this process please read >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> > smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-3
-1 for now.
check OK: $ ./verify-ofbiz-release.sh apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip Using sha file: apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512 apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip: 74F79D42 2746A409 9C0F2E0D 5F96C070 78C73D7B 4C681452 EB974F18 33E2E391 3E1C7D1F 2F0E8A44 C18AC8FF A9F86094 4C9F5D4D 5DDA3AB9 E2DC2057 CA0F2E33 apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip: 74F79D42 2746A409 9C0F2E0D 5F96C070 78C73D7B 4C681452 EB974F18 33E2E391 3E1C7D1F 2F0E8A44 C18AC8FF A9F86094 4C9F5D4D 5DDA3AB9 E2DC2057 CA0F2E33 sha checksum OK GPG verification output gpg: Signature made Fri Jul 3 16:04:40 2020 gpg: using RSA key 7A580908847AF9E0 gpg: Good signature from "Jacopo Cappellato (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[hidden email]>" Running OFBiz (gradlew loadAll ofbiz) is OK but I initially get: 2020-07-03 16:56:13,607 |catalina-startup-6 |CatalinaContainer |I| host[StandardEngine[default-server].StandardHost[0.0.0.0]].addChild(StandardEngine[default-server].StandardHost[0.0.0.0].Standa rdContext[/ecommerce]) Jul 03, 2020 4:56:13 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester error SEVERE: Parse error at line [20] column [24] org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId: file:///C:/projectsASF/Git/ofbiz-framework/tools/apache-ofbiz-17.12.04/applications/commonext/webapp/ordermgr-js/WEB-INF/web.xml; lineNumber: 20; columnNumber: 24; cvc -elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 'web-app'. at org.apache.xerces.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(Unknown Source) I think we should mention that this is not a real issue referring to the corresponding Jiras. The same reappears when running testIntegration. I see another issue locally, that exists also on R17 demo: 2020-07-03 03:10:02,911 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil |E| Column [ACCOMMODATION_CLASS_ID] of table [OFBIZ.ACCOMMODATION_CLASS] of entity [AccommodationClass] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null values. [...] 2020-07-03 03:10:03,092 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil |E| Column [CITY] of table [OFBIZ.ZIP_SALES_TAX_LOOKUP] of entity [ZipSalesTaxLookup] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null values. This does not exist in trunk, did not check R18. Weirdly it does not exist in Buildbot either for R17. Even before Michael's last fix for AJP. Anyway I don't use AJP locally nor does Buildbot. And finally it does not prevent the tests to pass. I'm not sure what this is or if it's random. But it would certainly not look good to users's views. We need to understand what's the problem is. I also found a bug in scrum/template/AcceptedBacklogNotification.ftl but that can wait. Jacques Le 03/07/2020 à 16:23, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > This is the vote thread to publish a new bug fix release from the > "release17.12" branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 17.12.04", will > supersede all the previous releases from the same branch. > > The release files can be downloaded from here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ > and are: > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip > * KEYS: text file with keys > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.asc: the detached signature file > * apache-ofbiz-17.12.04.zip.sha512: checksum file > > Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions > on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html). > > Vote: > [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 17.12.04 > [ -1] do not release > > This vote will be open for 5 days. > > For more details about this process please read > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html |
Administrator
|
Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> I think we should mention that this is not a real issue referring to the corresponding Jiras. Forgot to mention it's OFBIZ-6807 and related Jacques |
Administrator
|
Le 03/07/2020 à 19:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> I think we should mention that this is not a real issue referring to the corresponding Jiras. > Forgot to mention it's OFBIZ-6807 and related I just fixed a miss in OFBIZ-6993, should not be a worry anymore Jacques |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> I see another issue locally, that exists also on R17 demo: > > 2020-07-03 03:10:02,911 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil |E| Column [ACCOMMODATION_CLASS_ID] of table [OFBIZ.ACCOMMODATION_CLASS] of > entity [AccommodationClass] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table > needs to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot > have an null values. > [...] > 2020-07-03 03:10:03,092 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil |E| Column [CITY] of table [OFBIZ.ZIP_SALES_TAX_LOOKUP] of entity > [ZipSalesTaxLookup] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs to be > re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null > values. > > This does not exist in trunk, did not check R18. > > Weirdly it does not exist in Buildbot either for R17. Even before Michael's last fix for AJP. Anyway I don't use AJP locally nor does Buildbot. > > And finally it does not prevent the tests to pass. This is no longer a problem. I fixed it in OFBIZ-11312. I wrongly removed a line when backporting by hand in R17 I see now no reasons to create a new "Tentative release files for Apache OFBiz 17.12.04" Thanks Jacques |
Thank you Michael and Jacques for your feedback and fixes.
This vote is cancelled, I am going to prepare new release files and start a new vote thread. Jacopo On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 11:56 AM Jacques Le Roux < [hidden email]> wrote: > Le 03/07/2020 à 19:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > I see another issue locally, that exists also on R17 demo: > > > > 2020-07-03 03:10:02,911 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil > |E| Column [ACCOMMODATION_CLASS_ID] of table [OFBIZ.ACCOMMODATION_CLASS] of > > entity [AccommodationClass] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS > a primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table > > needs to be re-created or modified to add this column to the primary > key. Note that data may need to be added first as a primary key column > cannot > > have an null values. > > [...] > > 2020-07-03 03:10:03,092 |OFBiz-batch-2 |DatabaseUtil > |E| Column [CITY] of table [OFBIZ.ZIP_SALES_TAX_LOOKUP] of entity > > [ZipSalesTaxLookup] IS NOT a primary key in the database, but IS a > primary key in the entity definition. The primary key for this table needs > to be > > re-created or modified to add this column to the primary key. Note that > data may need to be added first as a primary key column cannot have an null > > values. > > > > This does not exist in trunk, did not check R18. > > > > Weirdly it does not exist in Buildbot either for R17. Even before > Michael's last fix for AJP. Anyway I don't use AJP locally nor does > Buildbot. > > > > And finally it does not prevent the tests to pass. > > This is no longer a problem. I fixed it in OFBIZ-11312. I wrongly removed > a line when backporting by hand in R17 > > I see now no reasons to create a new "Tentative release files for Apache > OFBiz 17.12.04" > > Thanks > > Jacques > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |