jquey
Locked
123
123
 
|
We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use
jquery... is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the merge of the jquery branch? -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. |
|
Seems like it would be prudent to wait until it is merged from the branch given the amount of work going on there already. Why don't you put your features into the jquery branch as further examples of where it will be utilized?
Cheers, Ruppert On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use > jquery... > > is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the > merge of the jquery branch? > > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > |
|
|
In reply to this post by hans_bakker
Hans,
On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is complete. Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk quickly so you can add additional features much more easily? Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use > jquery... > > is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the > merge of the jquery branch? > > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > |
|
|
I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl
macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the trunk. If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it..... Regards, Hans On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote: > Hans, > On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is complete. > > Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk quickly so you can add additional features much more easily? > > > Thanks and Regards > Anil Patel > HotWax Media Inc > Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use > > jquery... > > > > is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the > > merge of the jquery branch? > > > > -- > > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. |
Administrator
|
Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far
Other opinions, ideas? Thanks Jacques From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> >I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl > macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the > trunk. > > If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it..... > > Regards, > Hans > > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote: >> Hans, >> On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is complete. >> >> Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk quickly so you can add additional features much more easily? >> >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Anil Patel >> HotWax Media Inc >> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >> >> On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >> >> > We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use >> > jquery... >> > >> > is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the >> > merge of the jquery branch? >> > >> > -- >> > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >> > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >> > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >> > >> > > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > |
|
Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far > > Other opinions, ideas? > > Thanks > > Jacques > The sooner the better ! Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz |
|
|
You're welcome
+1 Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES <[hidden email]>: > Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >> >> Other opinions, ideas? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> > > The sooner the better ! > > Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha > > -- > Erwan de FERRIERES > www.nereide.biz |
|
|
+1, always better to merge sooner, get more testing on it...
Marc Morin Emforium Group Inc. ALL-IN Software 519-772-6824 ext 201 [hidden email] ----- Original Message ----- > You're welcome > +1 > > Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk > :-) > > Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES > <[hidden email]>: > > > Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far > >> > >> Other opinions, ideas? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Jacques > >> > > > > The sooner the better ! > > > > Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha > > > > -- Erwan de FERRIERES > > www.nereide.biz |
|
|
In reply to this post by Sascha Rodekamp-3
+1
Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-) -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong) On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Sascha Rodekamp <sascha.rodekamp.lynx.de@ googlemail.com> wrote: > You're welcome > +1 > > Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) > > Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES < > [hidden email]>: > > > Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far > >> > >> Other opinions, ideas? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Jacques > >> > > > > The sooner the better ! > > > > Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha > > > > -- > > Erwan de FERRIERES > > www.nereide.biz > |
|
Administrator
|
I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this merging. So hopefully I will do it soon.
If you are interested you can already check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814 Jacques Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: > +1 > > Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-) > > >> You're welcome >> +1 >> >> Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) >> >> Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES < >> [hidden email]>: >> >>> Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >>>> >>>> Other opinions, ideas? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>> >>> The sooner the better ! >>> >>> Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha >>> >>> -- >>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>> www.nereide.biz |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
sigh so all work on Selenium screens will have to be re-done.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:35 AM: ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far > > Other opinions, ideas? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> >> I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl >> macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the >> trunk. >> >> If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it..... >> >> Regards, >> Hans >> >> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote: >>> Hans, >>> On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is >>> complete. >>> >>> Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk >>> quickly so you can add additional features much more easily? >>> >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Anil Patel >>> HotWax Media Inc >>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>> >>> On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>> >>> > We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use >>> > jquery... >>> > >>> > is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the >>> > merge of the jquery branch? >>> > >>> > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>> > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>> > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >>> > >>> >> >> -- >> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >> > > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who have custom projects or applications based on the trunk have a reference point in the event that they want to freeze their applications at a particular revision?
Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery. I am all for consolidating/simplifying our Javascript libraries. No reason to have 3 libraries that all essentially do the same thing. In the end, Javascript is Javascript. My heart says we should have chosen Prototype as that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a big Prototype JS evangelist). But, my head says that JQuery is the right choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of developers and has much more wide-spread community involvement as far as development of plugins is concerned. Ryan L. Foster 801.671.0769 [hidden email] On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this merging. So hopefully I will do it soon. > If you are interested you can already check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814 > > Jacques > > Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: >> +1 >> >> Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-) >> >> >>> You're welcome >>> +1 >>> >>> Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) >>> >>> Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES < >>> [hidden email]>: >>> >>>> Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>>> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >>>>> >>>>> Other opinions, ideas? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>> >>>> The sooner the better ! >>>> >>>> Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>>> www.nereide.biz > > |
|
Administrator
|
Ryan Foster wrote:
> What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who have custom projects or applications based on the trunk > have a reference point in the event that they want to freeze their applications at a particular revision? Yes, that's what I have proposed. With another option: to have a branch. But I think the later is more a fork and I prefer the 1st. > Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery. I am all for consolidating/simplifying our Javascript libraries. No reason to have 3 libraries > that all essentially do the same thing. In the end, Javascript is Javascript. My heart says we should have chosen Prototype as > that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a big Prototype JS evangelist). But, my head says that JQuery is the right > choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of > developers and has much more wide-spread community involvement as far as development of plugins is concerned. I think we now all agree on that Jacques > Ryan L. Foster > 801.671.0769 > [hidden email] > > On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this merging. So hopefully I will do it soon. >> If you are interested you can already check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814 >> >> Jacques >> >> Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-) >>> >>> >>>> You're welcome >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) >>>> >>>> Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES < >>>> [hidden email]>: >>>> >>>>> Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>>>> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >>>>>> >>>>>> Other opinions, ideas? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The sooner the better ! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>>>> www.nereide.biz |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
Why? Did you use Dojo or Prototype?
Jacques BJ Freeman wrote: > sigh so all work on Selenium screens will have to be re-done. > > Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:35 AM: > > > ========================= > BJ Freeman > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > >> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >> >> Other opinions, ideas? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> >>> I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl >>> macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the >>> trunk. >>> >>> If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it..... >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hans >>> >>> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote: >>>> Hans, >>>> On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is >>>> complete. >>>> >>>> Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk >>>> quickly so you can add additional features much more easily? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks and Regards >>>> Anil Patel >>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>>> >>>> On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>>> >>>>> We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use >>>>> jquery... >>>>> >>>>> is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for the >>>>> merge of the jquery branch? >>>>> >>>>> -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. |
|
|
before I jump I guess I should test.
my thinking was the screens as Selenium would see them be changed, so the tests would fail. will try over the weekend ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 12:27 PM: > Why? Did you use Dojo or Prototype? > > Jacques > > BJ Freeman wrote: >> sigh so all work on Selenium screens will have to be re-done. >> >> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:35 AM: >> >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> >>> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >>> >>> Other opinions, ideas? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Hans Bakker" <[hidden email]> >>>> I would be in favor to merge quickly, like the replacing of the ftl >>>> macroprocessor, the system only get properly tested when it is in the >>>> trunk. >>>> >>>> If it is in the trunk, we will help debugging it..... >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hans >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:18 -0500, Anil Patel wrote: >>>>> Hans, >>>>> On other thread Jacques indicated that work of migrating to JQuery is >>>>> complete. >>>>> >>>>> Do you think, it will be good idea to merge JQuery branch with trunk >>>>> quickly so you can add additional features much more easily? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>> Anil Patel >>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We have a number of new ofbiz features lined up, however they use >>>>>> jquery... >>>>>> >>>>>> is it possble to add the jquery libraries earlier then waiting for >>>>>> the >>>>>> merge of the jquery branch? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>>>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > |
|
|
Le 02/12/2010 21:48, BJ Freeman a écrit :
> before I jump I guess I should test. > my thinking was the screens as Selenium would see them be changed, so > the tests would fail. > Hi BJ, maybe, but work should not be so important. Selenium are also broken when an elenent is changing its location, like a button-bar instead of a link, etc... Anyway, the problem will be in finding the element, so very little change in the end. Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz |
|
|
Chuckle
that is what I thought, and I dread more workload to just keep up. at this point I think you and I are the only ones that have invested in Selenium ========================= BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Erwan de FERRIERES sent the following on 12/2/2010 1:50 PM: > Le 02/12/2010 21:48, BJ Freeman a écrit : >> before I jump I guess I should test. >> my thinking was the screens as Selenium would see them be changed, so >> the tests would fail. >> > Hi BJ, > maybe, but work should not be so important. Selenium are also broken > when an elenent is changing its location, like a button-bar instead of a > link, etc... > Anyway, the problem will be in finding the element, so very little > change in the end. > > Cheers, > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jacques Le Roux
Why you think that making a new release branch would create a fork?
It will be managed as we manage R10.04 and R9.04 right now. Only bug fixes will be backported. -Bruno 2010/12/2 Jacques Le Roux <[hidden email]> > Ryan Foster wrote: > >> What about creating a tag or branch before the merge so that users who >> have custom projects or applications based on the trunk >> have a reference point in the event that they want to freeze their >> applications at a particular revision? >> > > Yes, that's what I have proposed. With another option: to have a branch. > But I think the later is more a fork and I prefer the 1st. > > > Oh and +1 on merging in JQuery. I am all for consolidating/simplifying >> our Javascript libraries. No reason to have 3 libraries >> that all essentially do the same thing. In the end, Javascript is >> Javascript. My heart says we should have chosen Prototype as >> that one (as anyone who knows me would agree, I'm a big Prototype JS >> evangelist). But, my head says that JQuery is the right >> choice for the long-term growth and success of the project, as it has >> definitely become the drug of choice for a majority of >> developers and has much more wide-spread community involvement as far as >> development of plugins is concerned. >> > > I think we now all agree on that > > Jacques > > > Ryan L. Foster >> 801.671.0769 >> [hidden email] >> >> On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> I'm sorry for Bruno, but it seems everybody is looking forward for this >>> merging. So hopefully I will do it soon. >>> If you are interested you can already check >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814 >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Yeah, I would love such a great Xmas present :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> You're welcome >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Would be a great Xmas present to merge all the stuff into the trunk :-) >>>>> >>>>> Am 02.12.2010 um 10:59 schrieb Erwan de FERRIERES < >>>>> [hidden email]>: >>>>> >>>>> Le 02/12/2010 10:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks like, apart Bruno, we are all on the same page so far >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other opinions, ideas? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The sooner the better ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for all your work, Jacques and Sascha >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>>>>> www.nereide.biz >>>>>> >>>>> > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by BJ Freeman
BJ Freeman wrote:
> Chuckle > that is what I thought, and I dread more workload to just keep up. > at this point I think you and I are the only ones that have invested in > Selenium The solution there is to stop maintaining it outside of the normal development pipeline. Get it into trunk, make running selenium tests automatic, with a simple call in build.xml. |
|
|
Good morning chaps
Calling selenium from the build XML is a great point. I tried that a few month ago in another project once selenium is set up right it's really helpful So in my opinion we should def think of it. Cheers Sascha Am 03.12.2010 um 07:42 schrieb Adam Heath <[hidden email]>: > BJ Freeman wrote: >> Chuckle >> that is what I thought, and I dread more workload to just keep up. >> at this point I think you and I are the only ones that have invested in >> Selenium > > The solution there is to stop maintaining it outside of the normal > development pipeline. Get it into trunk, make running selenium tests > automatic, with a simple call in build.xml. |
«
Return to OFBiz - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |